Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Company should pay for employee to get university degree.
In modern societies, there are various companies that all of them have competition together. Each of them has perfect conditions for workers which these states have impacts on their popularity. In my opinion, one of the good prerequisites is paying money to an employee for their educations at a high level, because this work has positive feedback for the company. I will address the most discernible reasons I feel this way in the following essay.
To begin with, having an educated employee has different points for factories because a skillful employee with his/her knowledge can help the company to develop in better conditions. As you know, the educated staff has more information and he/she is professional in his/her major. If one company has an educated job-holder can improve the situation's company with his/her education and causes the company has an acceptable economic situation compared to other companies. Consequently, paying money to the employee by the company makes a good position for it. To further illustration, I would like to demonstrate a history. Two years ago, a textile company in my hometown makes a condition for their workers that to continue their educations. The company sent workers to a good university and asked them to learn especially a course about marketing techniques. After passed two years, now this company has a lot of branches in different cities, moreover, this company is the best textile factory in the whole country. Actually, the company with a rational think makes more money for it. The company's manager knew that if workers went to a college, they came back with more data which this knowledge creates a great condition for the company. As a result, if an office sends their employee to the university, they will get lot of skills that these abilities help the company has a better position.
Secondly, some workers in the company have a bad economic situation and for this reason, they cannot continue their education, so they have low confidence and this condition affect their works. The company can pay money to workers in order to follow their educations, so with this action, the company helps them and it causes workers to have more firmness. Therefore, this event causes employees to work carefully than before and it is good for the company. Consequently, giving more stipends to the employee by the office has benefits for both sides.
In conclusion, taking all the reasons and examples into account, I believe that if one company wants to have a light future, it should do a specific work like paying money to employees to keep on their training. This is because continuing education cause workers to take expertise and they gain more confidence that both of them help the company can enhance the condition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | NIMA SAEEDI | 73 | view |
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Company should pay for employee to get university degree. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?It is better for the younger people to ask the risk and explore new things than the older people. 83
- Summaries the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage. The cane toads population 83
- Summaries the points made in the lecture,being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. two hypotheses about see otters populations declining 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, i feel, in conclusion, you know, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03253796095 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70813848434 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459869848156 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8289811864 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.476190476 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9523809524 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90476190476 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261908589714 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883575731612 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513956962509 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164170748779 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483044942274 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.