In the recent days, the world has been changing enormously at a lightening speed with the advent of new ideas and technology. Most of the views of previous generations have been moderated nowadays. In the past, we mostly dependent on our parents to make decisions about our lives. Many people might argue that this dependency remains same in our generation. But personally I think, young people today are performing well in taking decisions about their lives. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs present a cursory glance at the most compelling reasons.
The first reason that comes to my mind is that in modern days there prevails a flow of information. There are lots of online resources on any topic. Thus, if a person have some time he/she can make research on any topic. Youtube, facebook groups, blogs, newspapers, online communities etc provide a lot of contents and people can learn from these sources. Therefore, these open resources help people to analyze current trends, learn something that excites him/her and validates each hypotheses. For this reason, to take every decision, young people do not feel the need to discuss with parents, who were only source of knowledge in our days. Advancement of technology helps people to take better decision without any doubt.
Another reason that deserves some word is that people nowadays are more career oriented. Discussion on career path is common between group of people. Also, educational institutes and other organizations arrange workshops, training and discussion sessions on regular basis. To get expert opinion, people today participate in those social gatherings. For example, last week I attend a workshop on career path which discussed about future aspects of computer science in job market. Thus, I get a clear picture from the meeting and choose to pursue my degree in computer science.
Finally, it is tough for people of older generation to adapt with fast moving changes in our world. Previously, parents mostly guide their kids based on their experience and sometimes they prefer to make their children follow tradition. Now, the world is open to young people and they have all the options in front them to choose which is best for their lives.
To wrap it up, advancement of technology make the world smaller and open unknown opportunities to all. Consequently, this diminishes the dependency of young people on parents to take decisions for their future.
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 76
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 80
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 80
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible.First, atmospheric 80
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called Phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66844524021 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4417599011 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.0 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.88709677419 307% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377616287647 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931250021235 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104165347523 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214239884091 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913302910244 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.