Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Current society is undergoing continuous changes: mobile phones is becoming widespread; spacecraft successfully landed on the moon; people can find jobs online. Then, the question goes, “Are people supposed to work quickly and risk making mistakes in order to cope with these changes?” “Or, is it better for them to work with a slow pace to make sure everything is correct?” From my perspective, I favor the former one. First of all, timing is so critical. Slower reaction to changes may lead people to miss important opportunities; on the contrary, pioneers are often granted with huge competitive advantages. Take Taobao as an example. Taobao was established as the first C to C online shopping website in China, founded by Alibaba Group in 2003. Although it seemed that the design, the functions and other parts of Taobao was not as delicate as Amazon’s or eBay’s at that time, it did successfully seize China’s C to C market with good timing. Followers like Jingdong can hardly defeat Taobao to be the Top 1 in the e-market. Clearly, waiting till everything is in good condition is not a wise choice facing with this fast-changing world. Moreover, it is hard to make sure everything is in perfect condition. That is, many variables may contribute to some unfavorable conditions, fouling up all you’ve planned. Once I planned to take my daughter to the Disney Land which was just open in Shanghai. In order to avoid waiting in the long line, I formed up a “perfect strategy” including the best arriving time, sequence of items and even the best day to play. However, this “perfect” plan was screwed up by the terrible weather. It rained all day long. So, uncertainties create huge obstacles for making sure that everything is correct. Admittedly, serious errors should be avoided when increasing the productivity. The falling of Nokia was due to its unwise decision to adopt Windows System for its mobile phones. If Nokia had done more comprehensive researches into the market conditions, customers’ needs and developers’ needs, it might still be the top 1 in the mobile phone market. However, there is no certain correlation between the working pace and the number of mistakes that would be made. In a nutshell, in order to be adapted to such as fast-changing world, work with higher efficiency is a better choice rather than making sure everything is OK.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...my perspective, I favor the former one. First of all, timing is so critical. Slo...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e facing with this fast-changing world. Moreover, it is hard to make sure everyt...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ns, fouling up all you've planned. Once I planned to take my daughter to the Di...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1506, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d waiting in the long line, I formed up a 'perfect strategy' including ...
^
Line 1, column 1807, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...making sure that everything is correct. Admittedly, serious errors should be avo...
^^^
Line 1, column 2283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number of mistakes that would be made. In a nutshell, in order to be adapted to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1234256927 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14798583142 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60201511335 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5205291769 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8571428571 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9047619048 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25291140382 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626772954528 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801694572012 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25291140382 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.