In recent years, the world has been changing enormously at tremendous speed with the advent of new ideas and concept. Moreover, often people hold the view that nowadays it is required to be swift at work and thus workers with capability of finishing a job faster are highly appreciated. However, from my perspective I disagree with the concept that quality or correctness of work should be valued less compared to rate at which jobs are completed. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraph present several essential and compelling reasons with evidences.
First and foremost, the main reason why I hold this idea is that it is crucial to maintain quality of a work. Nowadays, it is observed that a product manager involved many people to finish a job with greater speed and thus increase the production rate. But, this kind of policy sometimes deteriorates the overall quality of work and in turn it would not be beneficial if we consider long term scenario. For example, I have been working in a software company for last two years. In our previous projects, quality assurance was given lesser priority compared to number of features developed. In this approach, we developed a lot of features in a short time, but later we have to be engaged in those project for a long time to fix bugs as it was not tested by professional team before to save some time.
The second rationale behind the opinion is rooted in the fact that inappropriately completed jobs ultimately causes trust issue among consumers. It is a know fact that, it requires much time and effort to gain trust of someone rather than losing it. Thus, if a team only focus on showing output faster, it might degrade the quality and ultimately end users would not be happy with the final product. To shed light on this issue, I can share my own life experience while I was working in a software project. We developed a new software and did not allocate much time for testing for quick profit and released within a very short time. But market users were unhappy with our work as it crashed frequently and thus they gave us a lower rating and we have lost trust of our users.
Moreover, it is necessary to build up new generation of workers while working on a project. Thus, proper documentation and hands on training are essential. So, enough time should be allocated to allow the new employees to learn from current project. Otherwise, they would fail to maintain current progress in future and eventually company would fall.
To sum up, though it is often necessary to complete a job faster, but it is crucial to allocate time to achieve best quality output.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...uses trust issue among consumers. It is a know fact that, it requires much time and ef...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 105, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'achieve the best'.
Suggestion: achieve the best
..., but it is crucial to allocate time to achieve best quality output.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75869565217 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62675901996 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541304347826 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1008217284 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.238095238 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9047619048 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111109004846 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346665716904 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322331784977 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575318711638 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444330606858 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.