Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Living and working in a constantly changing world, it is widely acknowledged that time is life and we need to make good use of it in any occasion possible. In this sense, some people argue that it is more wisely to finish tasks in a short time with the risk of mistakes than to sacrifice efficiency for correctness. This opinion, makes sense to some extent though, is disagreed upon by me. I will elaborate my reasons for holding so in detail in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the quality of an assignment is much more vital than the speed it is done. The boss is expecting a perfect performance rather than a hasty one since the latter is a waste of his time to look at. If an employee hand in a commercial contract awash with flaws, even if it is finished within half a day, the leader will not be satisfied. Highly likely, the result will be that this individual starts the whole task once again to correct the mistakes, which virtually wastes longer hours. However, if the man changes his way of thinking and checks every detail carefully from the very beginning, it will not end up such a mess.
Another reason we should not prefer the so-called efficiency over correctness is that once mistakes occur, the person who makes them will be considered reckless ever since, which will definitely exert negative impact on his career path. Take the employee from the last paragraph again as an instance. It is basically not probable that his boss will allocate any important work to him since his carelessness has been entrenched in the boss's mind. From this we can see that quick work neglecting correctness might cost a worker's vocation promotion. Nevertheless, carrying out tasks with due scrutiny might win the applause from the leader and facilitate vocational development.
While I understand that sometimes to scrutinize assignments with due prudence might be time-consuming and cause overtime working, which is a burden to employees. If people consciously cultivate themselves the habit of working carefully, this problem will be gradually solved at last.
To put it in a nutshell, the real situation necessitates workers to thoroughly weigh the pros and cons before jumping into the arrangement of time. As discussed above, I can safely come to the conclusion that working slower to make sure there is no mistake is more favorable because eventually it is the most effective way and will save people from undue troubles as well as assist them to prospect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 80
- The cane toad is a large (1.8kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers‘ crops by eating harmful insects. Unfortunately, the toad mult 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...ork neglecting correctness might cost a workers vocation promotion. Nevertheless, carry...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88862559242 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75255200323 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585308056872 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7601065512 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.611111111 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183131455688 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527862510989 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411243565768 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100817252668 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541588766499 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.