Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Cars have always been an inevitable part of today's life, since they facilitate our lives by reducing the amount of time which is required to reach a place rather than walking or riding the bicycles. With this in mind, some people may hold this opinion that the number of cars would increase in near future due to the great demands, while others look at this concept from a distinctive perspective and believe that there will be fewer cars. Personally, I subscribe to the latter groups for quite a few reasons which are as follow.
First of all, the number of cars in use will become fewer because of the presence and development of public transportation systems in all societies. By this I mean, developed taxies, buses and trains can supersede the great number of cars that individuals may use. As an implication of this issue, government and institutes attempt to solve the fundamental problems such as air pollution and traffic jam in most of the cities. Focusing on public transportation vehicles and encouraging individuals to use them frequently, enables organizations to overcome these troubles. To illustrate my point, I would like to provide the results of one study on this topic. It shows that the countries in which organizations improve the quality of public transportation, people are more willing to use them instead of their own cars and its result in much bigger scale demonstrates the drastic reduction in using cars in the upcoming twenty years.
Another equally momentous point that should be mentioned is that, the famous companies like Uber and Google are trying to provide a remarkable service for all people from any social status all around the world to access and use the airline taxies which are as cheap as regular ones. What I mean is, cars can be replaced by helicopter taxies in future. This service will definitely discourage people to use their own cars and its outstanding benefit is that people can commute in quite a bit shorter time between their houses and offices. Hence, the fewer cars will be used in future thanks to the innovation of such creative organizations that try to increase the quality of life for people.
In conclusion, according to the reasons that mentioned above, I strongly believe that fewer number of cars will be used in future rather than today. Since not only can developed public transportation systems persuade people to use them in order to solve the problems of traffic and air pollution, but future airline transportation also can be an alternative to their cars.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-12 thonsapon83 90 view
2020-01-03 nusybah 70 view
2019-12-18 TEJAS PATIL 70 view
2019-11-19 Luis Cortes 60 view
2019-10-12 fofty 70 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user nazlinazli :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 520, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...roups for quite a few reasons which are as follow. First of all, the number of cars in u...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...rs can be replaced by helicopter taxies in future. This service will definitely discourag...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, may, so, while, i mean, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94145199063 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74798186485 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512880562061 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6016771267 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.666666667 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4666666667 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251173666102 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922092862111 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695881748618 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163997110971 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246027901742 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.