Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Young people have always been prominent part of the society. Not only could they be affected by governments' policies and laws but they are able to influence their community as well. Although many disagree that young people are eligible to participate in taking crucial decisions for the society, others agree. In my perspective, I firmly believe that the young are future makers of each society. In what follows, I will explain my reasons and examples to illustrate my standpoint.
First point is merit to pay attention to is that, the young could involve in political and social decisions indirectly, as they vote to their candidates who pave the way for meeting of their needs. In this case young people have the right to take vital decisions and change the future of their own community by their own choices. An example may illustrate my reason. This year the election was hold to determine the next president of my country. Most people especially the young ones who had the majority age participated in election to vote the eligible and competent person to become the president. The young knew their votes have always had the power of changing the society in the way they would like. Therefore, the great number of them voted and the person who was more peaceful and wise enough was elected. As you see, young people affected the important subject of each country and elected the one who directly govern the country in a way that people asked him.
Moreover, young people could influence on their own society directly, as they study the majors related to establishing laws or other vital subjects such as politic, laws, medicine and so forth. They should compete with others who interested to enter in such positions in court, assembly. After a couple of years of earning experience, they can become a candidate to being a president. For instance, the presidents of France, Emmanuel Macron, who studied politic along with work as politician in government for some years then he tried hard to become successful in presidency election of his country. A few years ago no one stimaet a very young guy is going to be the president of France and bring economic stability with his reforms.
To sum up, I totally agree that not only do the young determine the future of their society indirectly by attending in government elections, but they also affect it directly, since there are a lot of young presidents all around the world who have studied and worked for this position.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 73
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85815602837 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55301636734 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520094562648 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4186343738 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.157894737 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2631578947 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212749289048 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068449900563 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440666713261 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138482850634 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313093743523 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.