Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use that there are now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use that there are now.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Submitted by Dozer on Wed, 02/07/2018 - 12:53

The highly developed transportation has benefited people in many ways. Personally, I think that in twenty years human beings will utilize more cars than they do now. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, people enjoy driving, and so they will not abandon cars. Contemporary automobiles have many features which make driving truly comfortable and pleasant. If an individual feels great while operating a car, he will use it constantly. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I am passionate about traveling and when I have a few days off work on a raw, I take a trip to a new place. I travel by my personal vehicle which is equipped with a GPS system for navigation, an air-conditioner to maintain a pleasant temperature inside, and a radio to listen to my favorite music. Not only that, but my automobile is reliable and has never broken down. Despite the fact there are many other types of transportation such as plains are available for travelers, the automobile is the most convenient one and is always on hand. That is why I think that people will not stop exploiting cars in the future.
Secondly, cars are necessary to commute to many citizens. Plenty of places in the United States lack public transportation and for people who live in rural areas, their personal vehicles are the only way to get to work. For example, I live on the outskirts of a large city where no buses are available for locals. Therefore, I have to have an automobile to drive to a pharmacy where I work or to a grocery store to buy food for my family. Moreover, as I read in a local newspaper, the government is not going to evolve the public transportation in the nearest future, and so dwellers of my small community and I will have to continue driving our cars every day. Although we could ride bicycles to work in the summertime, during the winter this would be impossible to do. As a result, residents of my town will keep heavily utilize their cars in twenty years from now.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the number of automobiles on roads will not decrease in the future. This is because cars are enjoyable to operate and because many people need them to commute.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-02-07 Dozer 70 view
2018-02-07 Dozer 70 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user Dozer :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore to buy food for my family. Moreover, as I read in a local newspaper, the gove...
^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: SUMMER_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'summer'.
Suggestion: summer
...h we could ride bicycles to work in the summertime, during the winter this would be imposs...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cause many people need them to commute.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63567839196 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79454935063 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547738693467 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5798326529 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8571428571 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9523809524 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149974164637 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479433619569 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624479354611 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104601455013 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561991378779 0.0645574589148 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.