Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Submitted by toefl2012 on Wed, 02/13/2019 - 12:27

Transportation has a tremendous impact on our progress and well-being. In fact, it makes life going easier and faster at the same time. Having a car has been an inevitable part of an individual's life. Therefore, adamantly I disagree that the cats will be fewer in the coming 20 years than today.
First and foremost, the population growth dramatically influences the demand for cars. And the researchers approved that there is a huge growth in population all over the world. No doubt, the cars would be required even more than nowadays. In addition, having own car make life easier for the whole family, especially for the kids. For example, kids would be more comfortable at a family car, like singing in loud voice, choosing the songs they love, fighting together and eating anything they want. On the other hand, they could not do such a thing in public transportation. If the cars number diminished in the future, this would be a big problem for a lot of people who used to utilize their own cars. Although might some people would be in favor of a decrease in cars number because they might think about traffic jam or pollution. In turn, cars have more advantages than disadvantages. Thus, population growth and family requirement would increase the number of cars in the future.
The second exquisite point to be mentioned here is that the advent of technology has provided an opportunity to culminate the fact that modern life is more complicated than it used to be. Besides, technology makes cars more interesting and challenging simultaneously. For example, any car now has navigator which helps find the direction and its really interesting and the list goes on. If the technology didn't develop that fast and apply this development to cars, the driving would be so boring and a lot of people would prefer to use public transportation. Even though there are many people hate technology and prefer to live life so basically, still the innovations make cars more reliable. So, the number of cars would increase quickly within years due to the fact that technology has a huge impact on developed cars and makes it more interesting for people.
Due to the aforementioned, I totally disagree that cars will be fewer in use in coming 20 years because the population growth and technology increase car uses and demands.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...a car has been an inevitable part of an individuals life. Therefore, adamantly I disagree t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wer in the coming 20 years than today. First and foremost, the population growt...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ease the number of cars in the future. The second exquisite point to be mention...
^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...and the list goes on. If the technology didnt develop that fast and apply this develo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... makes it more interesting for people. Due to the aforementioned, I totally dis...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, really, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in fact, no doubt, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8835443038 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80738376807 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501265822785 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8119101174 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8571428571 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8095238095 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187026736801 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636258686436 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712084273482 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151560409458 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579740020591 0.0645574589148 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.