Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Seeing the current senerio; increasing number of cars every year, it is hard to believe that after 20 years we'll not have cars in use as much as these are in present time. However, increasing pollution, increasing fuel prices, rapid extortion of natural resources cast doubt on the future of cars. In my opinion there will not be so much impact on the cars usage in upcoming years, as scientists are really involved in inventing new technologies which can replace non-renewable fuels to a renewable one, such as solar power, wind power, and other form of sustainable energy. That is why, I think, application of cars in the future will not be inhibited.
Firstly, innovation is an everlasting process and it will give us some alternatives of petrol, deisel and gases. In future I think, science will we able to generate enough enery from renewable resources such as from water, from sun, or even from wind. So I think the biggest danger- fuel problem- on the fate of cars can be hindered by such advancements. For example, at present the scarcity of petrolium and bans on the middle east countries have given the opportunity to the innovators to find alternates like converting water into fuel by seperating hydrogen and oxygen from the water and then use it for cumbutsion. Recent prototypes have been launched and demonstrated such engines which could run on water. However, due to huge cost and less efficiency has thwarted the process but as much as research and developement will be done, thos technology can proved to be a realistic solution to the problem of energy. That is why I think fuel problems for the cars can be resolved.
Secondly, car is the most covenient way travel for a short or medium distance. There are many other transport option available such as motorbike, bycycles, buses, and trains, but all these transport options are not as much as feasible the cars are. For instance, If one wants to go to work car provides best option as it'll have better protection from accident, dust and pollution than a bike and the car is more reliable than big vehicles like buses and trains, as we can take the car even in small street where large vehicle can't go. There are chances that shape, design and size of cars might change after 20 years but it'll still be as popular as it is now or even more popular. That is why I think cars can't be replaced and will not be less numbered in future.
With above reasoning and citation as invention in alternate fuel and humans' continued neccessity for cars. I aver that cars in the futures will not be limited to a small amount.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | TEJAS PATIL | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Luis Cortes | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | fofty | 70 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high. Archaeo 73
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 66
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 58
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h enery from renewable resources such as from water, from sun, or even from wind....
^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'provides the best'.
Suggestion: provides the best
...nstance, If one wants to go to work car provides best option as itll have better protection f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ven in small street where large vehicle cant go. There are chances that shape, desig...
^^^^
Line 5, column 707, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... more popular. That is why I think cars cant be replaced and will not be less number...
^^^^
Line 5, column 754, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... replaced and will not be less numbered in future. With above reasoning and citation ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re. With above reasoning and citation as invention in alternate fuel and human...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, for example, for instance, i think, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2136.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69450549451 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58350129237 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52967032967 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.1483656964 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2777777778 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174433311139 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621707774619 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428610625495 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117932586567 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195738056303 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.