Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject
Nowadays, our lives become more complicated than before. Different fields of knowledge are assembled by humanity in order to confront their problems. In that case, many people assert people should learn as much as academic sciences that they can whereas others believe that people should become experts in just one specific field. As far as I am concerned, the second thought has advantages over the first one.
Firstly, as knowledge varieties expand day by day, the dept of each knowledge enlarges too, so people simply could not become familiar with any fields of knowledge unless they spend huge time on those.Therefore, it is not enough for people to have broad knowledge since they cannot apply it. For example, about a thousand years ago, a person was able to learn astronomy, medical science, and mathematics during his life. However, these days, a person even cannot reach to a point that he could claim that he knows a field of knowledge perfectly. So, if people do not spend much time in a scientific field, they cannot have enough knowledge to use in the real world properly.
Moreover, in the present day, not only should people use a scientific field for their lives but also they have to expand it. The reason is, we live in an era in which knowledge is blooming in every moment, so if a person wants to be considered by society as a useful member, she has to make vast advances in a field of knowledge. When I gather all of the mentioned information together, I reach this belief that people should learn a field deeply to can cause progress in that field nonetheless it would be a useless endeavor.
All in all, learning a field of knowledge deeply is neither a waste of time nor useless. The fact is, it is exactly the opposite due to the requirement to learn science deeply in order to apply that practically. So, in my opinion, people should not waste their time "to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects".
- TPO 52Do you agree or disagree? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 76
- agree or disagree? Television advertising directed toward young children should not be allowed 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 70
- Agree or disagree? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ge unless they spend huge time on those.Therefore, it is not enough for people to have br...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... in a field of knowledge. When I gather all of the mentioned information together, I reach...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, whereas, as to, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76401179941 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61887433787 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536873156342 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1878710686 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.357142857 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150780577667 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524673221 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568469326871 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958697970937 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433479446449 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.