Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the contemporary world, the friend is not a fresh world. People often influence with friends in every stage of their lives. However, the question is who is important? Some people believe it is better to add new friends to get extra support. On the other hand, if I were asking, I would definitely disagree with that statement. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
The first reason is comfort. The old friends are more comfortable because they know everything about us and we have a mutual understanding. On top of that, they maintain confidentiality, and it is very important in a friendship. Consider my personal experience as an example of this. When I was studying for my master’s at Ohio state university, I have a friend whose name is Ram. He is my childhood friend and I used to share all my personals with him. While we studying at college, he got an on-campus job, but I didn’t. He tried a lot and talk to the administration department and the dean of the college for my job and finally I got a job with his recommendation. What’s more, last year we got an award for best friends on the campus.
The second reason is the emotions. I personally believe, emotions are important for strong and long-lasting relationships. If we know a person for a long time, they are emotionally attached to us and our families and after a while, they are like our family members and they take all responsibilities. Consider my school friend, whose name is Alex as an example to illustrate this. He is one of my best friends and he is very close to my family. When I was moved to Taxes for my studies, He supported my family a lot. Especially, my sister marriage last year. He is the one taken care of all the requirements and act like a own family members. If we were adding new friends, This kind of relationship wouldn’t possible.
In sum, although adding new friends is important, I personally believe old friends are always important. They are more comfortable and emotional then new friends. I recommend the people not lose your old friends.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | m_elec | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | JohnSmith96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Navis | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | swapnil.paliwal | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | swapnil.paliwal | 66 | view |
- organic food vs non-organic food 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Should children grow up in the countryside or in a city? 3
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 61
- benefits of the excessive taxes from smokers and unhealthy food products 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...re of all the requirements and act like a own family members. If we were adding n...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, while, i feel, kind of, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66397849462 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01940361409 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521505376344 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2914526166 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.2592592593 100.406767564 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7777777778 20.6045352989 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03703703704 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193932063368 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577085870318 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453072402592 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142497861752 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646316069808 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.