Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that all of the abilities can teach and can be improved in each person. Contrary to this popular beliefs there are still those who argue that each person have some special abilities naturally and this abilities transmit just genetically and practice for the increase an ability in person is not the very successful plan. I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that leadership comes naturally and one can not learn to be a leader.
First and foremost, separate from new development in science and psychology, we have a lot of a good example that can be certified this claim that the ability of leadership do not just naturally and people can learn to become a leader. For example, Napoleon Bonapart that he was one of the famous leaders in the history of the world. his mother had a very significant role in teaching him and help him to increase his personality and self-confidence. Surely, without guilds of his mother, he could not become a renown leadership that everyone can remind his on their mind.
On another significant fact, that should be taken into the consideration is that we know that the person who studies in the sacred schools they have special training to prepared them for leading people in the societies. Most of the people accept them and follow their ideas and try to do their advice on their life. Certainly, all of these people have not this ability naturally, but they learn to become a leader by learning and spend a lot of different courses to increase their ability in this work.
Finally, yet importantly, each of natural ingenious cannot be flourished without presenting in the suitable condition to can grow. We have a lot of people that they have very special abilities but they do not never known and remained dormant forever. Identifying and improving each ability, especially in today's world needed the very precise method of determining and teaching to knowing talented people and teaching them. Furthermore, now through development in the education system, we have a lot of successful managers and supervisors that they become the leader just by study in the universities.
On the basis of reasons that mentioned above, I am convinced that the ability of leadership can to learn. Because of several historical and alive examples and result of psychologists research.
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends. 86
- Do you agree or not?Because people are busy doing so many things, they do very few things well. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do.Do you agree or disagree? 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that all of the abilities can teach and can be improved...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ve some special abilities naturally and this abilities transmit just genetically and...
^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: His
...us leaders in the history of the world. his mother had a very significant role in t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, still, for example, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96708860759 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75537260504 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488607594937 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3976151563 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157976825087 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617589818408 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726660119218 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948226459055 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254346252938 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.