Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in a contemporary, sophisticated society we live in, the leaders of small and big communities are assumed to have an increasingly essential role in every individuals’ life. There is a substantial number of people who are of the opinion that one cannot learn to be a leader and it comes naturally. While there are those who believe that if you are determined to become a leader, you can definitely do. I personally concur with the latter group's idea. There are several reasons to support my standpoint. The most important ones of which will be elaborated upon below.
One imperative reason coming to mind at first is that nowadays, we have access to a lot of reliable sources which can help everyone to become a successful leader. There are some relevant majors like leadership coaching at the university which every individual who is keen on leadership can seek and reach their dreams. One of my father's friend is a compelling example of this. When he entered the university, he followed the medicine. However, after four years, he decided to change his major entirely and apply to the leadership coaching major at the Oxford University. Now after fifteen years, he becomes one of the remarkable leaders of England in coaching the companies, and he is so accomplished in his field.
Another interesting point which deserves some words here is that as you know, practice makes perfect. Thus, if you are determined to become an accomplished leader, you can be inspired from the life of previous leaders and by sticking to your goal, you will undoubtedly become an unrivaled leader. For example, one of my friends who is the leader of a big company named Sony followed the same way. First, he studied a lot of books and biography of successful ancient business leaders like Bill Gates. He found that the critical factor in his success is practice. Therefore, He tried to improve different aspect of his individuality. He persevered in spite of a lot of obstacles he had in his path. Eventually, in the long term, he could reach his dream and become the leader of a well-known company.
To make a long story short, taking all of the aforementioned ideas into consideration, one can safely assume that being leader in present day society is not a far-fetched objective since not only do many sources and courses provide an excellent opportunity to gain knowledge for who wants to become leader but also by practicing and sticking to your aim, every apparently impossible goal becomes possible.
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 mm in 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 36, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
.... To make a long story short, taking all of the aforementioned ideas into consideration...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, you know, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91822429907 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88623472781 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546728971963 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.6132644754 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.238095238 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238626611922 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704471834753 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064667751446 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15080172513 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654961995776 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.