Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Leaders are the indespinsible part of each society. Excellent leaders can make bring out everyone best out of their jobs while improper leards are recipe to a disasster. Opinion on this issue are divided. Although some people believe that one can achieve the power of good leardership through practicing, others disagree with this point of view. In my opinion, learderships comes naturally. The reason why I believe so are manifold, however, three of the have great reasoning, which are elaborated hereunder.
First and foremost, an magnificient leader needs to be sturdy and strong enough to confront the hard times and pave the way for other colleagues. Such strong pecularity cannot being created over night; Leadership idiosyncrasis is needed. For instance, while I was a student at high school our pervious manger retired. Thus,we had a manger who was new to our school. She lack this inherent factor and owing to the fact the it was her first time ruling a school as giant as ours, she was not capable of managing our school as marvelouse as before. She needed a lot of time bring out her best for ruling the school. As years passed away, we though that finally there will be a day that she can mange our school as perfect as our perior manger did, but it never happened. Thereby, as can be inferenced from the example above, leadership is an inherent pecularity.
Second, there have been proved that each individual have differnet kind of IQ and EQ. We can expect everyone to have the same capability in doing each task. There is a great quot in my culture "leave the job for the one who knows it better." I am a great believer that people need to do task and jobs that comes naturally in them. So, the only thing they need is, promoting that idiosyncrasis for better perfomance in their job.
Last but not least, the will reinforce the percedeing claims, if this charachterestic was not inherently, then everyone could be a great leader. Which in retrospect, can be infernced there was not such a episode in all history. Great leaders like Mahtma Gandy, Barke Obama and so on, all had this ability naturally. On the other side, we can see people like Ahmdi Nejad, the previous persident of my country, who created a disasster for people of my country and economy of my country.
To sum up, no one can deny that fact the leaders impact on the companies, countries. And it has been proved that those with greater ability ruled better during history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...borated hereunder. First and foremost, an magnificient leader needs to be sturdy ...
^^
Line 2, column 322, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
...school our pervious manger retired. Thus,we had a manger who was new to our school....
^^^
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'lacks'.
Suggestion: lacks
...a manger who was new to our school. She lack this inherent factor and owing to the f...
^^^^
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...s inherent factor and owing to the fact the it was her first time ruling a school as g...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ct, can be infernced there was not such a episode in all history. Great leaders l...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, thus, while, for instance, kind of, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75757575758 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6208594414 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543123543124 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5156017115 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0416666667 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133161217297 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396703841873 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365503867764 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733414258288 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021442141696 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.