Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.
Although a certain conclusion cannot be made, in spite of all honest companies’ advertisements, I firmly concur with the idea that most advertisements magnify about quality of products. The following paragraphs will substantiate the most outstanding reasons
First of all, one should take into account this significant fact that majority of people do not have sufficient awareness of real quality of products advertised. Hence, companies exploit this unconsciousness and impose their opinions on people’s mind. As a matter of fact, it seems indistinguishable for people to choose high quality products. To illustrate, one needs only to refer to the number of children and adults impressed by subjective statements in advertisements. To demonstrate, most of the scientists all over the world contend that the people based on the advertisements make decision about quality of products. Therefore, they established an experimental program worldwide to estimate the effectiveness of advertisements on people’s shopping. The results are surprising: over 90 percent of people are cheated by biased statements in advertisements and prefer to buy products advertised even with low quality.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that due to tough competition between companies, each of them tries to broadcast some advertisement to attract more attention. The modern world offer abundant examples of companies in order to survive in the market they exaggerate about their products’ quality. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that the majority of companies do not care about the quality of their products, but pay attention to advertisements of their competitors.
In today’s tough life, being aware of real quality of products is vital to everyone to have efficient shops. Taking all aforementioned arguments into account leads us to the conclusion that we should contemplate about whether companies are honest about their products or not. Indeed, companies not only exploit people’s unawareness of product quality but also consider only their profits to stay in the competition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | naziii | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | prayashpathak | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | sadra1988 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | farnaz9494 | 76 | view |
- Online encyclopedias vs traditional version of encyclopedias 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment, doing things they like to do, rather than doing things they should do 70
- 4-day employees instead of five days. 86
- Whether hydrogen fuel-cell engines are better substitute for internal-combustion engines or not? 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn how to manage their money at a young age. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent social research'.
Suggestion: recent social research
...ly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that the majority ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'apart from', 'in conclusion', 'as a matter of fact', 'first of all', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269922879177 0.229887763892 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.125964010283 0.158761421928 79% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0899742930591 0.0866891130778 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0437017994859 0.046263068375 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0359897172237 0.0685040099705 53% => OK
Prepositions: 0.154241645244 0.118717715034 130% => OK
Participles: 0.0282776349614 0.0351676179071 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.41602111635 2.67179642975 128% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0411311053985 0.0309702414327 133% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0822622107969 0.0887237588012 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.012853470437 0.0209618222197 61% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0139019557991 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2262.0 2387.08602151 95% => OK
No of words: 335.0 408.028673835 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.75223880597 5.86048508987 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48200974243 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.438805970149 0.338922669872 129% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.349253731343 0.251872472559 139% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.268656716418 0.174417080927 154% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.208955223881 0.112833075102 185% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.41602111635 2.67179642975 128% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.524397521467 111% => OK
Word variations: 65.3333287349 59.2087087015 110% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6684587814 68% => OK
Sentence length: 23.9285714286 20.5533526081 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.610163952 48.84282405 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.571428571 120.699889404 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.5533526081 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 0.644075263715 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 58.8539445629 45.7405998639 129% => OK
Elegance: 2.2 1.45489161554 151% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159717786963 0.300154397459 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0974401746038 0.103427244359 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0543961714098 0.0752933317313 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.56607456622 0.497263757937 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129992034142 0.151897553556 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782890337324 0.114077575197 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536685311433 0.0781384742642 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.436223213821 0.336927656856 129% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0616535071269 0.067059652881 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127263607942 0.210909579961 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494611686053 0.0618886996521 80% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.6433691756 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.