Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Movies and TV programs made in one’s own country are
more interesting than those made in other countries.
In the modern era, people spend their free time in various ways. Some might enjoy watching TV while others might prefer other activities such as reading a book. TV programs comprise a diverse variety of shows in which every individual can find their appropriate program with a negligible challenge. The controversial question which arises here is whether TV programs are more interesting when they are made in someone’s own country or not. I adhere to the idea that says it is more interesting to watch domestic TV programs for some reason. In the following paragraphs, I will clarify my viewpoint by mentioning reasons and elaborating them.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt that TV programs are art forms no less than others. We know for sure that art products emanate from its context, which here is society. Indeed, art is a form of expressing society’s needs and desires. To put it differently, artists make art with direct and indirect influence from their society, and as art provides a mean for people to convey their ideas to others, artists can talk with their audience. When one watches a TV program which is made in his country, he can maintain rapport with the program; therefore, the demanded route for conversation will flourish. In this manner, I think TV programs that are made in one’s habitat can excel from other shows.
Another critical point to mention is that language spoken in TV programs is a crucial element for constructing the route mentioned above. There is an accumulation of evidence that says people tend to watch programs in their language because, in this way, they won’t squander their time reading the subtitles. Even in the case of dubbed shows, it is acknowledged that translating won’t contribute thoroughly to transfer the ideas fairly. I, personally, don’t enjoy watching movies or TV programs in languages rather than my mother tongue. Hence, I believe suitable shows for me are the ones which are made in my own country.
To sum up, I cling to the idea that says TV programs that are made in one’s fatherland are more attractive to him. It is highly recommended that authorities allocate enough budget to conduct research for different people’s ideas and perspectives about what a TV show should consist of in order to supply a birds-eye view for producers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | mohamadjhr | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Professional athletes, such as football and basketball players, do not deserve the high salaries that they are paid. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for the government to spendmoney on art museums and concert halls than onrecreational facilities such as swimming pools andplaygrounds. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Advertising is the most important cause of unhealthyeating habits. 76
- Imagine you are an undergraduate student, for your final semester what would you prefer?1. Conducting an intensive research and writing a paper on the topic.2. Internship 90
- If you want to get a promotion at work which of the following measure would you take 1 Do more extra additional jobs 2 Participate more actively or state more personal opinions in group discussion 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, while, as to, i think, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00767263427 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84551422831 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544757033248 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3435033169 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.052631579 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5789473684 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287340442275 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964172654519 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754134225434 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181906565182 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337797713288 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.