Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Printed books have had greater effects on society than televisions.
In the modern era, technology is being developed at a galloping rate. This progress has resulted in many breakthroughs of technological devices. One of the big challenges of big societies is making a balance between their traditional things and technology. The controversial question which arises here is whether can we overlook the impact of technology in our everyday life or not. Some people are of the opinion that the effect of printed books will never be paled; while some believe that televisions have the most influence in the societies. As far as I am concerned, the role of printed books pales in comparison to the significance of televisions. In the following paragraphs, my viewpoint will be elucidated through two remarkable reasons.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that televisions have more audience. There are numerous ways that TVs can be more attractive rather than books. Watching TV is noticeably addictive for many various advertisements that they show in each program so the diversity is the important key for audiences to follow up the TV shows. Also, watching TV provides pure entertainment for people who are involved by hectic lives. It helps them to relieve their daily stress, and it is a great economical pastime. Actually, it helps people get together and spend quality time together. Although it might have several benefits for families, it causes irreparable physical and mental health problems. For instance, my sister used to watch TV every day when she wants to spend her leisure time. After a while, she faced sophisticated problems such as eyesight problems, obesity, aggressiveness, etc. In consequence, my parents decided to limit hours of watching TV in our home. Had my parents became more aware of negative effects of watching TV, my sister wouldn’t face these sophisticated problems.
The second pivotal reason is that not only do printed books not have greater effect than televisions on societies, but also those lose their invaluable place among adolescents and young people these days. As a matter of a fact, technology has caused the trend away from tradition toward modernization. There is no doubt that new technological devices play a prominent role in the society. Recent researches show that the majority of people would prefer to read electronic books instead of printed books. This indicates that people are more familiar with modern ways than old-fashioned ones. Furthermore, some people are concerned about environmental issues. They provide big TV shows to encourage people to save the world by reducing usage of papers. They believe that the more e-books, the more green world. In conclusion, young generations are more interested in these announcements that they receive through televisions.
To bring everything into conclusion, television have had greater impact on societies than printed books. To state the obvious, it is highly suggested that people should be aware of advantageous and disadvantageous of watching TV as well as they should not forget the cultural training of books; however, there is no difference that they would opt to read electronic version of books or printed ones.
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To solve present and future problems it is necessary to understand the past 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Printed books have had greater effects on society than televisions 92
- If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?1- riding bicycle or walking on foot2- recycling the waste3- buying local organic food 90
- At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity- for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2668.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2416502947 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97626290678 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557956777996 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 831.6 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9358221375 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5517241379 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93103448276 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19131889184 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043647663632 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654161837536 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123556684872 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431232039878 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.