It is commonly acknowledged that the Internet has provided people with great convenience. However, it is still uncertain whether professors should prohibit students from the use of devices that can connect to the Internet while in the class. From my prospective, I strongly oppose to it for several sound reasons discussed below.
First and foremost, exposed to the Internet, students can search for information whenever they want. Admittedly, students can have easy access to varieties of materials if they can check things in the Internet. In this way, students are able to have a more substantial comprehensive of the class and react more actively in class. Take me as an example. I usually felt trouble in understanding the professor because I sometimes misunderstood some vital points and was too shy to ask the professor after class. After I got my first laptop in college, I often searched for more information about the topic that the professors talked about, which greatly enhanced my academic performance.
On the other hand, without the availability of the Internet, students may find it difficult understanding professor’s ideas as the professor can’t always realize students’ situations and sometimes even miss important contents. Thanks to the Internet, we can get to learn these missing points with a simple click. Not only will it help us study the professor’s lesson, but it can also inform us in more details which the professor may not cover in limited class hours.
In a nutshell, I firmly reckon that it is an irreversible tendency that students should be allowed to use devices that can surf online while in the class. Actually, from what I stated above, it is obvious that the Internet can do benefit to students a lot if it is implemented wisely. Students should be endowed with the permission of using the Internet so that we can have a class in a high quality.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:professor should prohibit the use of devices that can connect to internet in class 76
- People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community? Explain why?۱٫ Plant trees 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06349206349 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0044294167 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6558892176 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329814529252 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115467489026 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959154270648 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218460685607 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678504683777 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.