Do you agree or disagree with the following statements？ Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the contemporary and competitive world, people are very busy in doing different kinds of work. But are doing so many things productible for public or they are just wasting their precious time. Some people strongly believe that doing many different things are very beneficial for them because they get great experience. However, I believe that the benefits of doing less number of things far outweigh any negative repercussions.
First of all, people can not focus with equal efforts in plenty of things. In order to work effectively with greater results, there should be proper attention and concentration towards it otherwise it is just the waste of their precious time. Furthermore, there is no doubt that people do lot of hard work is doing so many essential things all together, but what is important is the output. Thus, there is need to prioritize the things rather than doing it all together.
Indeed, in the race of competition people have lot of work to do on daily basis, which may lead to unnecessary work pressure. This will not only affect their work efficiency, but also can be a reason of deadly diseases like hypertension, blood pressure, migrane etc. For instance, one of my colleague, working as finance manager recently became a patient of diabetes. In the months of November and December, there was plenty of work to complete as the deadline of year end approaching. The pressure of finishing the work on time and fear of loosing job if the work is not done on time forced him to take too much tension about his work, which resulted him in becoming a lifetime patient of diabetes. All in all, doing so many things and taking unnecessary pressure can be a term of your life, so amount of work should be selected very carefully and smartly.
In conclusion, although there are many people who think that doing a lot of different things will help them in future, I disagree. I think that everything that matters is the result of the work, which is the ultimately beneficial to them and not the quantity. I strongly believe that everyone should focus on the quality of their work rather than the quantity.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- TPO-44 INTEGRATED TASKSummarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native Amer 72
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 72
- The university has provided student who are going to enter university with two summer vocation grograms. Which one do you think is better for students?1) take some college courses in advance. e.g. some courses that are related to students' major. 2) visit 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...But are doing so many things productible for public or they are just wasting thei...
^^
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...Some people strongly believe that doing many different things are very beneficial for them bec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... lot of different things will help them in future, I disagree. I think that everything th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81198910082 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6416918325 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50408719346 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.505461002 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.882352941 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275080882079 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106202233961 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971717747662 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196249496973 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108342265815 0.0645574589148 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.