Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well.
As humans living in a civilized society, the majority of people are eager to be successful. There is a list of various methods, which is accountable for this demand of success. These methods of addressing have always been a controversial issue among the people. While, some people may take a view that the repeating a guaranteed path is a wise option to success, others may hold an opposite viewpoint and believe that the success is shaped based on the novel experiences. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reason which gives adherence to my viewpoint is that the repetition does not acquire the proliferated success. Even though, the repeating of an identical pattern leads to the specific goal; it does not provide different type of success. In another word, it is just the repeating of the same route. In my perspective, this outcome cannot be considered as the actual success; Inasmuch as, the people instincts are formed based upon the development and alteration. Moreover, the standing in a solo situation even ultimate to the success is contradicted with this initial demand. Thus, although the doing the same task with warranted results paves the path to a defined success; as long as, it is not reasonable of unsaturated people's requirements for adherence, it can be considered as a failure rather than the success.
The second case embraced my outlook is that it flourishes a sufficient experiences. It is explicitly obvious that the taking risks even with the failures expand the individual experiences, which are substantial factors for the success. Maybe, a person faces a drawback in the specific task, which he or she tries it for the first time; on the other hands, it provides other positive advantages such as experiences which she or he can gain their advantages in her or her next examination. In this condition, the ratio of failure is lower than past. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the subject is my own instance. Last year, I tried to participate in an exam for my graduate education, although I did not have the cogent background for this test, I took it. I failed in that exam; however, this year I took this same exam and I did not do the same mistakes, which without of naive experience in the previous exam it was impossible.
The last reason which indicates my idea is that the novel things present various outlooks toward a subject, and this variation provides the success. It is explicit as crystal, as an individual does not have the comprehensive outlook toward the subject, it is an arduous task to tackle it. Besides, the novel experiences acquire this holistic perspective. According to the noteworthy, intelligent survey conducted in my country, approximately sixty-nine percent of successful businessmen achieve their success based on the risks taken by them. In addition, these risks even with the failures illustrate a holistic outline from their goals.
To wrap it up, based on the all aforementioned reasons one can logically draw the conclusion that the taking risk is fundamental to the success. Since the repetitive pattern does lead to no chasm success, the risks provide the border experiences and comprehensive understanding.
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 66
- 1.Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.Write a response in which you di 83
- tpo33 86
- tpo41 81
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 62
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'in addition', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.216129032258 0.229887763892 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.146774193548 0.158761421928 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103225806452 0.0866891130778 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.041935483871 0.046263068375 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0645161290323 0.0685040099705 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114516129032 0.118717715034 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0322580645161 0.0351676179071 92% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94247462652 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0225806451613 0.0309702414327 73% => OK
Particles: 0.00161290322581 0.00188951952338 85% => OK
Determiners: 0.145161290323 0.0887237588012 164% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0129032258065 0.0209618222197 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0129032258065 0.0139019557991 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3357.0 2387.08602151 141% => OK
No of words: 556.0 408.028673835 136% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03776978417 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.48200974243 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.354316546763 0.338922669872 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291366906475 0.251872472559 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.219424460432 0.174417080927 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.143884892086 0.112833075102 128% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94247462652 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491007194245 0.524397521467 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 59.2722385933 59.2087087015 100% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6684587814 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.3846153846 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6061685049 48.84282405 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.115384615 120.699889404 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.538461538462 0.644075263715 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 50.5213060321 45.7405998639 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.43312101911 1.45489161554 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183258018311 0.300154397459 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.096212660026 0.103427244359 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0682106685104 0.0752933317313 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.529466447997 0.497263757937 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133725716315 0.151897553556 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761987388551 0.114077575197 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324058510643 0.0781384742642 41% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.540903914303 0.336927656856 161% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0400276084166 0.067059652881 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136089372254 0.210909579961 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105772701108 0.0618886996521 17% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8870967742 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.