tpo44
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the coin excavated in the Maine as the genuine historical evidence of interaction between the Native American dwellers and the Norse. While the reading part lists three reasons to reject the accuracy of this evidence, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information mentioned in the passage.
First of all, the article posits that the long distance between the Norse's settlement and the site where the coin has been found is a clue of the fake historical evidence. However, the instructor challenges the validity of this claim. As she asserts, the Norse people were eager to move the long distances and obtained the objects from those spots. Thereby this coin could have remained for this long trip to the Maine.
Secondly, the text mentions that since there is no other coin in the Maine site, this is the invalid case as the historical clue. On the contrary, the lecturer dismisses the validity of this surmise too. Based on her declaration, the Norse did not have the permanent residence in the Marine site, and after a while, they had returned to the Europe. It is feasible that they packed up whole their possessions and one of the silver coins had been forgotten in the site.
Finally, the reading passage assumes that for the sake of the trivial value of the silver coin for the Native American, it was useless to them. On the other hand, the professor states that although the silver coin did not own the same monetary value for the Native Americans as it has nowadays for us, as it was an attractive object it could have the alternative usage. For instance, it could have the utilization as the jewelry or the necklace, due to its appealing appearance.
- 1.Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, b 70
- 1.The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting 66
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? to improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for a university professor. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment – doing things they like to do – rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'first of all', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240356083086 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.127596439169 0.158904122519 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0890207715134 0.0723426182421 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0237388724036 0.0435111971325 55% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0415430267062 0.0277247811725 150% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127596439169 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0356083086053 0.0370669169778 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.44918632645 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0207715133531 0.0208969081088 99% => OK
Particles: 0.00296735905045 0.00154638098197 192% => OK
Determiners: 0.189910979228 0.128158765124 148% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00890207715134 0.0158828679856 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00593471810089 0.0114777025283 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1790.0 1645.83664459 109% => OK
No of words: 308.0 271.125827815 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81168831169 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.314935064935 0.374372842146 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.243506493506 0.287516216867 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.188311688312 0.187439937562 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103896103896 0.113142543107 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44918632645 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 56.9864943061 53.8517498576 106% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6923076923 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7999108998 49.3711431718 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.692307692 132.220823453 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 48.042957043 50.5018328374 95% => OK
Elegance: 2.09230769231 1.90840788429 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.691044426692 0.549887131256 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.199933953727 0.142949733639 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0801407939437 0.0787303798458 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.729466268693 0.631733273073 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.106455141815 0.139662658121 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.397725637101 0.266732575781 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089174364006 0.103435571967 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.616072534474 0.414875509568 148% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0399241590907 0.0530846634433 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.559514418159 0.40443939384 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540151923972 0.0528353158467 102% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.