Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays youth spend much of their time in classes under supervision of their teachers. Parents consider schools as places that would nurture their children's thoughts and actualize their character. So the school should be somewhere with high levels of validity and trueness. I agree with the statement mentioned by the author that teachers should keep their political and social views for themselves and here I'm going to explain why.
First off, people who are under supervision of a specific person are strongly affected by that person's thoughts and beliefs and this fact is more true about children. They are much more susceptible to what they hear and if they are composed to a condition in which someone spreads his or her contemplates, they would be more likely to imitate his or her thoughts in their lives. So it is a tough call while it comes to what to say and what not to say in front of some children.
Second reason for my opinion is coming from a personal experience. As I was in second grade in highschool I was madly into one of my teachers. She was the kind of person who lectured most of the time on her thoughts about government's non competency on taking effective actions on different social issues. I admired her so much that one time I printed a poster regarding a social-environmental issue and glued it to class door. And anyone could predict what consequences the act brought about for me. So now that I am a teacher, I try to limit my personal thoughts to my private groups and avoid sharing them with my students.
To sum it up, I don't believe that sharing the personal point of views among student is a wise action for the reasons I mentioned above. Everyone should consider that the more you unveil your private thoughts among young people the more you get to affect their beliefs in a way that may change their lives forever.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-27 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
2020-01-23 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
2020-01-12 | naziii | 70 | view |
2020-01-01 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
2019-12-14 | shrijan | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 3
- TPO 21 – taks 1 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 66
- TPO-23 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...nd social views for themselves and here Im going to explain why. First off, p...
^^
Line 9, column 68, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n is coming from a personal experience. As I was in second grade in highschool I w...
^^
Line 13, column 17, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... with my students. To sum it up, I dont believe that sharing the personal point...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, regarding, second, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68389057751 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62716685985 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537993920973 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0547971259 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.733333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171123677486 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564205330523 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667203172758 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112346618136 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081778543523 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.