Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is no secret that teachers play an essential role in training students and the curriculum of the school is very important for teachers to perform their duty in the best way. Among these subjects that must put in the program, political and social views also prepare them for having a pronounced effect in the future. Although some take a different view and declare it is unnecessary, the vast majority of the people agree with this issue. I firmly believe it will be helpful for students to know about the condition of the country. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my points of view cogently.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that they are going to society soon and changed to the decisive factor to plan for the future of their country and themselves. Hence, it is critical they somehow know about different issues in the school. As a case of point, I remember that our teachers sometimes talk about the problems in our society like the increasing number of addicted persons and alarmed us to be cautious when choosing a friend. Though some persons may hold an opposite view and disagree with me, my experience, without a shadow of a doubt, helped me to find a new friend.
Another equally noteworthy point in corroborating this issue is that the school is the place for learning much rudimentary and basic knowledge. It turns out if the school does not try to develop these matters for the students, how they will get familiar with these subjects. Thus, it seems it is better to know them from school. To take an example for clarifying more this matter, when they learn skills and knowledge in the school, they not only carved in their minds but also helped them to use in the appropriate place and time, due to the fact that the teachers knew their works better than everyone to decrease some demerits of these topics.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that they undoubtedly are better to start from schools and by teachers to have a maximum positive effect on the students because parents do not know how much and how they should teach their children. Consequently, it is anticipated by teaching them in the school, we will observe the perfect advantages in the next generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | naziii | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | shrijan | 73 | view |
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.— Wait until the class or meet 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' jobs.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 76
- integrated writing TPO 40 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- TPO 37 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72911392405 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59168552119 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53164556962 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.0241181681 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.533333333 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161493116266 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497159966851 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413760094383 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100681329382 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459686160114 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.