Despite the age, everybody needs friends. Most people are for the opinion that in order to be happy, you should be able to easily connect with strangers and make new friends. However, in my opinion, the depth of your friendships is what determines your happiness, not the quality of being an outgoing person nor the number of your friends. There are few reasons for this claim which I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, we should first consider the real meaning of the word friend. Not all the people you talk to or laugh with can be counted as your friends. A real friend is who always stays by your side in happiness and sadness and never let you feel alone or let you down while struggling with life issues. I can firmly state that it is very difficult to find these people. Hence, easily making friends, seems like a meaningless statement to me. To illustrate, I can recall one of my friends who is a social, outgoing person. She has gathered numerous people around her and you can never observe her alone. Although she is laughing all the time, I know that she feels extremely alone and unhappy.
Besides, each person who enters your life brings a handful of new problems with her. These days, everybody has various issues and a limited time to solve them and it is impossible to ignore your friends' difficulties. Hence, their problems will be added to yours and achieving happiness will get harder. For instance, my mother has a lot of friends and spends a huge amount of her time helping them solve their problems that she doesn't have enough time to focus on her own life. I know better than anyone that she is far away from being happy.
In summation, we should first review the meaning of friendship and our expectations from a friend. Happiness derives from deep friendships. Not every new friend can make you happy, instead, they bring new issues to your life. I suggest everyone focus on their close friends and allocate their time to their beloved ones rather than searching for new friends.
- TPO 53 Integrated Writing Tasks 68
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 66
- Tpo 53 Do you agree or disagree with the statement that governments should spend more money to improve internet access not on public transportation? 70
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 73
- TPO 54 Integrated Writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ping them solve their problems that she doesnt have enough time to focus on her own li...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, however, if, so, while, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67777777778 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38691779146 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.558281367 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1904761905 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205749004085 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610848367044 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399050121755 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132437771177 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223559851918 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.