Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
For many people, traveling is an excellent way to relief the daily stress. They work hardly during the year and save money to make at list a good trip when vacations time arrived. Most of them also, save money to pay a tour guide, because it is the best way to enjoy their vacations and keep them orientated. I believe this is a worthy investment and I will explain why I think so in the following essay.
First, when people travel they usually go to unknown places to discover the wonder of those cities. As they do not the places visited they have to guide themselves using maps or other methods of orientation. They do not realize that when travel outside of their countries they cannot use their GPS because the internet does not work. As a result, the best way to get orientated is hiring a tour guide that knows the city and other places that could be interesting to know. About three years ago, my family and I traveled to Peru to visit Machupichu. When we arrived the ruins, we had to find a tour guide that show us the place and tell us everything about that wonderful ruins that Incas discovered. The tour guide made a detail explanation about the place and how the ancients arrived that majestic place through inhabitant road. We have done many trips before without hire a tour guide, since that moment we realized the importance of hire someone that know the place you are visit. Therefore, you will never miss an important story of the place.
Secondly, traveling to places that people are not familiarized with, it is more probable that people get lost and also spend more of their budget. Furthermore, if a group of people organize and travel in a group led for a tour guide will spend less and all will benefit of the tour guide. For instance, last year when we travel to Europe we travel in a group of ten people. Each one pays a percent of the travel and the tour guide. When we arrived the Spain all of us went to visit the Mercado de San Miguel and the guide taught how to make Tapas. If we had paid the trip separated will cost more money, so we realized that our trip was cheaper than we thought.
Finally, for my experience I strongly believe that a tour guide is valuable when a group of people travel. They will know almost everything at the place visited and also, the expenses will split between each people of the group
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-06-08 | lauren1983 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.进入练习 73
- technology has made children less creative than they were in the past? 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Dancing plays an important role in a culture. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- twins studies 40
- asteroids are good for three reasons 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'work'.
Suggestion: hardly work
...nt way to relief the daily stress. They work hardly during the year and save money to make ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'place'.
Suggestion: place
... of the place. Secondly, traveling to places that people are not familiarized with, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44212962963 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28510447476 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7030741518 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.380952381 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178466746579 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609164709213 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047845245191 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111721632633 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215793269162 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.