Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
the government should support the university students financially rather than low-age children education.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education, as a means of learning and training, plays an undeniable role in one's level of perception and has to take widely into consideration by government. Therefore, on no account can one turn a blind eye to significant impact of researches conducted inside the university to disclose modern technologies boosting the society. Albeit someone underscore the fact that university directly interfere to advance of country, some other believe that low age children build the further future and deserve more fund. However, from my own personal perspective, the former opinion is principally more acceptable since the university shoulders heaviest part of country development. The supportive grounds substantiating my point of view are detailed in the undermentioned paragraphs.
First and foremost, one the most necessary issues to be funded by government is education and training of elite human resources who are able to come up with ideas to resolve problems that society currently face. As a matter of fact, a large quantity of examinations and researches have long been carries out through entire laboratories and departments of universities which brings about many prominent result. No doubt, under-ten-year-old children never would be able to bring such a practical and constructive idea contributing to make a step forward in advancement/progression of country. As a conspicuous example illustrating/exemplifying the paramount function of university, I should mention to one of recently precious achievements of it in my country. According to reports, it is said that the University of Tehran have succeeded to launch the first telecommunication satellite assisting to better phone reachability/availability.
Furthermore, the university educate students whom the country really demands them soon afterward. Each university student are being majored in one specific profession and they are live in the milestone period of their life that require more heed by government. No need to imply that the government should not only support them financially, but also provide opportunity such as offering future job enabling them put their knowledge and experience into use. I would rather to exemplify this notion by my own personal experience. After I finished my post graduate education in one of the best university of the country, although I was studying in a first-rate/top-of-the-line/high-end national university, government totally failed to take advantage of my knowledge as an elite/sophisticated work force due to the unemployment crisis, as many people have same situation, consequently, this is typical reason of ground lost of my country.
To encapsulate all the aforesaid accounts, investing on both the university and the kids education are unavoidable and government should pay sufficient heed on them. Nevertheless, the university matters should contemplate as first priority as it directly push future of the country toward the evolution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-31 | Mohammadbj | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?the government should support the university students financially rather than low-age children education.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The advice from the grandparents is of no use to their grandchildren because the world has changeda lot over the past 50 years. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d training, plays an undeniable role in ones level of perception and has to take wid...
^^^^
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'underscores'.
Suggestion: underscores
...es boosting the society. Albeit someone underscore the fact that university directly inter...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 627, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'shoulders the heaviest'.
Suggestion: shoulders the heaviest
...ly more acceptable since the university shoulders heaviest part of country development. The suppor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
...nvesting on both the university and the kids education are unavoidable and governmen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, as to, no doubt, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2522.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66741573034 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.87994692397 2.67179642975 145% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 817.2 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9601459548 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.352941176 100.406767564 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1764705882 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160725066922 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475697650562 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0234699673157 0.0737576698707 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937989556997 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183359175671 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 58.1214874552 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 10.9000537634 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 86.8835125448 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.