Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Quality of education is a very important part of our society. When the quality of education in universities is improved we can expect more qualified graduated, so the country technology can be more developed. More salary for university professors leads to improve the quality of education. Some tend to agree with this sentence; others would fundamentally disagree. I entirely agree with this statement for two important reasons.
First, obviously more money for salaries can motivate professors. Motivated professors are more hard workers who spend more time on the quality of education. I distinctly remember an unforgettable experience. Last year I was employed as a teacher assistant by Tehran university. At first, they paid to me just 5 dollars per hour of teaching. That was not enough money for a well-educated person who teaches in a university. I thought that I have to pay attention to the quality of my class as I am paid. After three months, the university increases my salary to 10 dollars per hour. I was so happy and satisfied therefore carefully paid attention to my classes and tried to improve the quality of my teaching methods. That experience obviously shows how an increase in salaries could influence the quality of education.
Second, without a doubt, a high salary for professors could make a stimulus for well-educated individuals that wish to work as a professor in universities whereby highly qualified graduated persons would prefer to work in universities rather than be an employee in the industry. When a university has better professors, it results in a higher quality of education. In my country, professor salaries are usually less than engineers. Well-graduated students have no tendency to work as a professor. Graduated students who are poor-educated and have no chance to be employed by an industry usually will be a professor. Therefore the end result of this phenomenon is a low quality of education in universities.
In sum, though some may disagree, I firmly believe that high salary for professors can improve the quality of education. Not only will motivate professors to increase the quality of their class but also make a stimulus to high-quality university graduates to be a professor. Governments should pay more attention to professor salaries if they want a high-quality education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her quality of education. In my country, professor salaries are usually less than...
^^
Line 9, column 518, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...work as a professor. Graduated students who are poor-educated and have no chance to be ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 618, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...n industry usually will be a professor. Therefore the end result of this phenomenon is a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23076923077 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16746195863 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6651785477 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1666666667 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7083333333 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.45110844103 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282545917025 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930369124755 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847802094614 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195219046556 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600440039125 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.