TPO 29-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Quality of education is an essential part of teaching in the university because students try to learn every thing that the teacher says and if they share more information, they can learn more. Some people believe that to improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors; others disagree. In my view giving more money to professors can be beneficial for improving the quality of education.
First, I think if the university give more money to professors, they have more money to spend on explanations and science. It is beneficial to spend money on those things because student can do innovative tests and achieve great results. For example, I remember last year I started to work on the lab of one of the professors of our university. At first my professor did not gave us a lot of money to spend on our tests, so we could not do anything interesting. But after a while our university decided to gave some budget to our professor, after that we had enough money to buy the ingredients that we needed and do the test that we could not do before because they were very expensive and we learned a lot of things from that experiments that help us to understand many of our courses better. So by give money to professors the quality od education and explanation can be improved.
Second, I think when professors have higher salaries they are more enthusiastic to teach everything they know in the class, and share all the information that they have. Moreover, with this extra salary they can buy extra equipment to teach better. For example, I remember last semester we had a class at the university that was about knowing different kinds of composites. We know that the university gave our teacher extra money to buy the things that he needed to teach better. Every time he brought different kind of composites that we knew were expensive and talked about them, and showed us inside parts of the composites. On that class we learned a lot of things that stayed in our minds because we saw those composites with our own eyes. As you can see by increasing the salary of our professor he could by extra things to teach us better and the quality of education improved.
In sum, though may some disagree, raising the salaries of professors can improve the quality of education, not only when the professor has extra money he can spend it on explanation and science, and students can learn a lot of things, but also the professor has more money to spend on equipment that can help the students to understand the courses better. So I think universities should try to give more money to professors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
- TPO 29-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 60
- TPO 28 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...iversity. At first my professor did not gave us a lot of money to spend on our tests...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, i think, kind of, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73706896552 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69008340976 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.390086206897 0.524837075471 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 700.2 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.1240864852 48.9658058833 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.111111111 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290391054586 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124238053967 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11897697247 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229424839318 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10365110417 0.0645574589148 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.