Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, the issue of professors' wage engendered copious controversies among universities. Some people may hold the view that universities should enhance professors' salaries. However, some other may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that universities should spend more money on building more facilities. As far as I am concerned, for increasing the quality of education, universities should enhance professors fee because not only can they better concentrate on their teaching job, but also it inspires them to work hard.
The first aspect to point out is that professor can concentrate on their teaching job. Nowadays, development of the technology happening at a very fast pace and this changes cause the price of materials increase. Therefore many people are obliged to have another job like professors. For instance, my friend has a professor in the civil engineering department that has an arduous life. He has to work in his taxi to obtain more money because he did not earn much money form his teaching work in a university. Hence, instead of focusing on his job, he was forced to do another job. Also, these jobs consume all his energy and in class, he was very tired and this effect on his teaching and learning of his students and it is obvious the quality of the education decreases.
A further more subtle point is that increasing the salaries of professor, motivate them to work harder. Moreover, they try to earn more money by publishing articles and gain fame. for example, one of my professor in universities were very famous and he was well-known in another country. Since, the first time he starts his work, he focuses on scientific discoveries and publishing a magazine and today he half the year going abroad to teach in foreign universities. Also, many clever people leave their education because they know that the can not make money off it. Furthermore, by changing this fact universities can hire astute students and professors to improve their quality.
To make a long story short, base on the aforementioned argument, due to inspire professor to work more efficient and they focus on their work, universities should enhance professors wages. Consequently, it is highly recommended that universities and college spend more money on salaries of their professor to enrich the quality of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... cause the price of materials increase. Therefore many people are obliged to have another...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 469, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...oney because he did not earn much money form his teaching work in a university. Henc...
^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...y by publishing articles and gain fame. for example, one of my professor in univers...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, as for, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13471502591 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90992500959 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518134715026 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3706112543 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.315789474 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3157894737 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225339317993 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771340865606 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790480333061 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164578536086 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722587852854 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.