It goes without saying that in today's progressive and intricate society that communication stands a critical role in the success of any project. Face to face communication takes time, space and preparation, which is expensive and time-consuming nowadays. E-Mail communication offers several distinct advantages for us including remote meeting, efficient conversation, and reliable backups. While some people might still believe that it's better to communicate with each other in person for discussing a specific project, I, however, subscribe to the former group in that there are certain qualities which cannot be found in face-to-face communications.
First of all, I strongly believe that as our world evolves, so does our technology. Several decades ago, people mainly communicate through letters and meetings. Although a person can share his or her idea through meetings and telephones, It's still impossible that he shares quickly enough. In order to schedule a meeting, he needs additional works and schedule management which is repetitive, tedious, and inefficient. When we work for or manage a class project, productivity is the only thing matters to the project outcome. With emails as a better communication tool, team members can reduce the time spent on unproductive activities thus allocating more time for their critical workloads. When I was in high school, CubeRun is an Android App project which I am responsible for the code review of our team. We utilized the potential of email communication to fully unleash the potential of our development team. Our development Kanban board, issues, and repository on GitHub are fully integrated with our anonymous Yandex Email. Instead of taking the time to meet each other after school, we saved our time by exploiting the daily communal time discussing potential bugs and future roadmaps. With traditional face-to-face communication, we would have lost a large amount of time to do our homework.
Email tends to be more reliable, secure, and intelligent than meeting in person. With the technology of GitHub Search and Elastic N.V., we can easily search through our history of conversation without the need for repetitive works. All our power can focus on creating new, innovative, and useful ideas. With face-to-face meetings, we have to take notes on every important detail to prevent being forgetful. Even worse, meetings can not retain themselves. But all these can change by email communication. When I was working for BEE Blockchain Foundation, I was responsible for the development of new office products. We use modern emails for conversations. What's more exciting, though, is that we integrate the Ceph S3 storage engine to back up our data on three different servers, Bing Text Analytics API to extract the important words in our daily conversation and GitHub Gist to make our conversation data fully searchable for late use. Without the power of these modern technologies and emails, our products will be delayed and vulnerable to data loss and repetitive workflows, which directly slows down our next release.
With the advent of today's technology, I think it's important to integrate email communication into every aspect of our work. The future should only be faster and productive. With the advent of IPad and Apple Pen, Instant Graphs and Scratches sharing will finally be enabled for us soon, giving us the power to create a brighter future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 657, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...We use modern emails for conversations. Whats more exciting, though, is that we integ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, still, thus, while, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2883.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 542.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31918819188 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98556653278 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 304.0 212.727598566 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560885608856 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 903.6 618.680645161 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2013848874 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.964285714 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82142857143 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170484411299 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479085628706 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475099602307 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118630481959 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385118633395 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 86.8835125448 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.