Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends.
In the modern era, a friend has played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is of paramount importance, many people have always sought ways to enhance the quality of relationship with friends. Whether or not people must be truthful in all condition with their friends, is controversial. I content that individuals cannot honest all the time with friends, so I disagree with this proposal. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first important factor to be mentioned is that a person has private boundaries in life. To elaborate on my point, most people try to make some borders in their life, and nobody has allowed to inter in these private boundaries. These boundaries consist of family condition and problems, their jobs and future planning. They believe that nobody, especially their friend, can enter this condition. If one of their friends want to arrive in privates border, people would not tell trust to them. For example, last month, I started fighting with my brother at night. Next day, I was really angry and upset. My friend ask me about my situation, and I did not tend to explain my problem, so I told a flaw to her. In this situation, I did not allow my friend to enters my private borders.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that telling the truth about all situation may destroy some plans and situations. To shed more light on this matter, people have specific days such as birthdays, the first day of work and many other days like that. In these situations, friends tend to surprise their friend and take some party for them. So, it is necessary to tell a lie to friends until all plans will run correctly. For example, I just wanted to surprise my friend at birthday time. I tell a lie to her that I had a serious headache, and I needed someone to help me. So my friend came to my home and she surprised and became so happy. If I tell trust to her, she would never surprise about a birthday party.
All in all, consider all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that individuals do not need completely trust and honest with friends. I believe that people not only have private boundaries that friends do not allow to enter it but also have some plan that they do not tell about them to their friend. So, humans do not need to tell truth about all thing to friends.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important way to improve people s health is to clean the environment 76
- TPO 43 80
- TPO 40 80
- Do you agree or disagree? People meet many problems in their daily life and they can solve them by themselves or with the help of their families, so the help from the government is not necessary. 66
- TPO 43 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...e quality of relationship with friends. Whether or not people must be truthful in all conditio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 194, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'interring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: interring
...s in their life, and nobody has allowed to inter in these private boundaries. These boun...
^^^^^^^^
Line 23, column 231, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'entering'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: entering
...te boundaries that friends do not allow to enter it but also have some plan that they do...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6926713948 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5395507252 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501182033097 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9384435133 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.92 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36 5.45110844103 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125039345276 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383552701272 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664854623755 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105849880688 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973100948298 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.