Do you agree or disagree? in order to be well-information, a person must get information from many different resource.
In the modern age, data and knowledge are important part of students and people life. Also, we have many available citations to collect and find information. I believe that humans must use various source to collect date; therefore, I agree with this proposal. Because of many originators, consuming many source help to have high quality of information. The following paragraphs by containing the main reasons, will substantiate my viewpoint.
The main reasons why I believe need divers source for having high rank of information is modern technology. To elaborate my point, we are living in the age which every second the data are updated. We can use many sources such as internet, newspaper, books, broadcast like satellites and many other similar items and containers. Hence, if people who want have high quality of information use different references, they would have sufficient acknowledge and it is promoted broad horizon of science. A significant example that strikes my mind is, when I was studding at university as master student, I wanted write paper about Microchannels. Owing to having international paper, I had use several references. Therefore, I used to cyberspace, books and other source to collect the best information.
In addition, I accept that using many sources is essential, so its help to reduce incorrect data. In my opinion use only a few sources not only increase possibility of fake information but also increase worth of data. In the other words, people for having worth paper or information so that needs many sources. A quite clear example would be my own experience. I wrote special paper, when I was student. This paper is so important for me. But I used only some resource, thus, some information from topic were rung, and my paper was rejected. If I had used different sources, it would accept on Chemical Engineering magazine. As a result of this, I was being punished that I had pay some money to the university.
To conclude, I generally hold opinion that people should use various resources to collect information. Where I stand from that, having many sources not only improve the worth of information but also reluctant fault data.
- Students of a university have a long break between university semesters; the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break: ۱٫ Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to their 70
- TPO 21 78
- Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation and are trying to decide between two places to visit Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice Why Reading about the places online Discussing them 76
- TPO 14 78
- TPO 20 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asons, will substantiate my viewpoint. The main reasons why I believe need dive...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 219, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mation but also increase worth of data. In the other words, people for having wort...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08913649025 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88560296634 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534818941504 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8745328443 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4347826087 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6086956522 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147379450775 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441459440146 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374440949902 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102997106958 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208658984629 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.