do you agree or disagree? People who develop many different skills are more successful than people just focus on only one skill.
The question is whether people with having different skills are more prosperous than those who concentrate on one skill. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this issue, some may say that it depends on a person's ability how to apply his skill in every field; however, I am inclined to express that in such a technology- driven world, having a broad scope from knowledge can lead us to succeed. I feel this way in some reasons, which I will explore them in following essay for empowering my claim:
To begin with, nobody could overlook this fact that such a modern world, that we live, requires a powerful and intense competition among human beings; hence, there is a compulsory force for acquiring diverse crafts. On the other hand, the inherent nature of humanistic is eager to obtain the success, so for many years people are attempting to find some approaches to dominate on other nations or communities. It goes without saying that learning different skills can assist us to gain this triumph in among of our friends or that same age people with us. One should not forget that being up-dated is able to motivate people for taking risk in any field; consequently, the sequence of this event can affect the personality of people. When you are saturated with a large number of skills; therefore, your self-esteem and the power of independence will be raised up. Finally with such a confidence, they can become to entrepreneurs of the societies.
The second reason why I concur with being skillful in every field lies the reality that since the population has increased in recent years and the young generation search for finding job, there is a trouble with lack of appropriate jobs. If we expect to have an enjoyable work with well-paid money, it is vital to improve our skills. Moreover, nowadays the companies prefer to hire people with interdisciplinary knowledge. To elucidate, take my own experience. I remember, an opportunity was created by archaeology faculty for all students to participate in an excavation project. The majority of overwhelming of students was reluctant because it required hard working. My main major was software engineering but I volunteered for this task. My soul was curious about exploring new points. Needless to say that it could bring me a huge mass of skills about how I could excavate in a site or how to behave with a new discovered material from underground. One year after that an international archaeology seminar took place in my university. In short, I had a chance to collaborate with a prominent professor in surveying the climate of middle east in 100000 years ago with writing a code program in computer and our project would receive some rewards; as a result, the role of having a variety of skills is obvious here.
As I have illustrated, I strongly agree to optimize ourselves with gaining diverse crafts. It not only can form our personality, but also it will provide a condition to obtain our favorite job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-31 | peerless alex | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Younger school children (ages five to ten) should be required to study art and music in addition to math, science, history and language. 90
- should people be far away from lovely relationships for a long time or not. 88
- tpo20 78
- tpo40 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ssue, some may say that it depends on a persons ability how to apply his skill in every...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 763, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... of people. When you are saturated with a large number of skills; therefore, your self-esteem and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 866, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ower of independence will be raised up. Finally with such a confidence, they can become...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, i feel, in short, as a result, to begin with, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2512.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90625 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81960636503 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 302.0 212.727598566 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58984375 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.3202914565 48.9658058833 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.619047619 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.380952381 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167313896419 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499109341238 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845455701414 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103404429949 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526699065622 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.