Do you agree or disagree? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.
The question is whether parents should prevent from playing computer games by their children or not. Everyone in consideration to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this issue; however, I am inclined to refute it because total disagreement with computer games can create destructive consequences. I feel this was for some reasons, which I will explore them in following essay to strengthen my point of view:
To begin with, one should not forget that when a person is forbidden from something, he will be greedier about it even more than before. Psychologists believe that people who inhibit their kids from harmful points like chocolate, junk-food, TV and computer games and list goes on, will cause children to become little liars. One should notice, nevertheless, they will find a way for access to their favorite entertainment; hence, families should talk them directly and explain merits and drawbacks of such programs or foods. Having an appropriate schedule can assist the young to manage their time between study and amusement; consequently, the problem of wasting time will be solved spontaneously. In short, banning can only get worse this plight.
The second reason for my argument lies in the fact that despite all disadvantages of such the games, designers of computer games take some advantages into account in this way. For instance, games are designed to challenge the imagination feeling of children. Nobody could overlook this reality that a child with high level of imagination will be able to provide some creative ideas during school. As a matter a fact, such the exciting games can enable children’s brain and even more rescue their mind from lethargy or numb feeling. It can be said that an active mind would help children to improve their performance not only in daily life, but also in school life.
As I have illustrated, I strongly disprove this statement because it is the parents' task to instruct their children the best approaches cope with adverse things. Blocking can be most straightforward solution; however, it can impinge on children's personality. Providing a logical program including playing games, enjoying chocolate and study will be most effective way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 3 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Somayya | 73 | view |
- what discovery in the last 100 years has been most beneficial for people in your country ? 85
- Do you prefer? Eating in restaurant or cooking at home? 90
- Tpo45 3
- do you agree or disagree? working near a relative can be effective. 76
- do you agree or disagree? students should consider studying in fields related to subjects like technology, math, science and so, if even they are more interested in other subjects. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, then, as for, for instance, i feel, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23676880223 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8210106139 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623955431755 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5199236007 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221543156435 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776504312967 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059819000744 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136564848621 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223983119912 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.