It is generally agreed that the Internet has become an indispensable part of our reality, and it is hardly possible to live a full life without having access to it. In this regard, personally, I am prone to believe that public transportation system improvement is not the highest priority of any state government’s policy, and, therefore, the development and access to technologies like the Internet is more important. I hold this opinion since the World Wide Web is a source of knowledge; and the Internet improves the quality of life of millions of people.
To begin with, the Internet has created opportunity for educating people at the various corners of the world, and in that sense it is one of the efficient tools of increasing the level of education all over the world. People nowadays have a possibility to get knowledge and skills sitting in their homes in any country of the Earth. For example, I live in Armenia, a country which is located in South Caucasus; however, I can take online courses at the Harvard University and increase the level of my proficiency. Thus, the Internet, without exaggeration, is vital for human development, and the more people have access to it, the more will change positively the picture of the world.
Additionally, new technologies like the Internet are crucial measures for the evolving of political, social and economic aspects of any state. This is explained by the fact that it provides technological solutions to problems which humanity had not been able to resolve until the invention of the Internet. For instance, in my country it could be hardly imagined that the spheres of economy may evolve without the Internet since it not only does connect various parts of economy together, but also provides new ways and forms of doing business. Consequently, the broad availability of the Internet is vital for all spheres of our lives.
To sum up briefly, public transportation is surely important part of our everyday life; however the Internet is an undisputed priority. The explanation to this is twofold: first, it provides opportunities in the educational sphere; and, second, without wide access to the Internet the political, social and economic spheres of our lives cannot evolve.
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that governments should spend more money to improve internet access not on public transportation? 70
- TPO 45- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 80
- Life is easier and more comfortable than it was when our grandparents were children. 70
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 78
- TPO 48- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mic spheres of our lives cannot evolve.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07027027027 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97063298575 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521621621622 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2161089751 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.307692308 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4615384615 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 5.45110844103 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191357969243 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669897766057 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548258190437 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11898087359 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610546466016 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.