Do you agree or disagree with the statement? People will spend less time cooking and preparing food in twenty years.
It is undeniable that people’s mindsets and priorities are changed. Some people believe cooking food is not related to the future or past, and everyone spends more time on it. However, I think less time will be spent preparing food in the future. I explain my two reasons in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, technology is becoming more advanced day-to-day. An important question is how technology can cause to reduce less time of cooking. In the future, sciences will be improved and become up-to-date. Also, scientists will be used them and invent new equipment to help people. In addition, cooking utensils are not an exception to this rule, and they will be modern and better equipped. People, who will be applying these tools, do not spend much time cooking. For example, in the past, early humans did not have any equipped devices like microwaves, ovens, toasters, and so on for making meals, and they had to use fire and simple pots for it. Because of this, they spent most of their time baking. In contrast, with growing technology, anyone does not have to stand in a kitchen to make food for a long time. As a result, technology decreases the time of cooking.
Second, people in the future will be busier and will not have enough time to prepare food. It means because wanting to live easily and gain more money, they have to work more hours. They prefer buying food or eating less food rather than spending time making food. About the example mentioned above, the primitives did not have to work to attain money because they could hunt and did not need money to buy food. But today, to have everything, you have to pay for it, and over time, all things will become more expensive, and more money will be needed. Finally, people would rather spend their time working instead of cooking.
To wrap it up, people will tend to spend less time making food in twenty years because of two reasons. First, technology is becoming improved every day. Second, working more hours to gain more money is essential for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-27 | porteghale Abiasli | 70 | view |
| 2022-05-17 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2022-05-17 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | yasamiamirreza | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | yasamiamirreza | 73 | view |
- Some parents offer their children-age school money for each high grade they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement People will spend less time cooking and preparing food in twenty years 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement People will spend less time cooking and preparing food in twenty years 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?a) Interrupt and correct the mistake right away, b) Wait until the class or meeti 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reducing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reducing
...nt question is how technology can cause to reduce less time of cooking. In the future, sc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, so, for example, i think, in addition, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74366197183 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33007982049 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532394366197 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5315028357 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.2173913043 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4347826087 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65217391304 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318785631003 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985493819199 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988203478068 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221870030737 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441066233616 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.