do you agree or disagree with this statement:
Nowadays act of having meals together with family members is not important anymore.
Undoubtedly, with the advances of the modern world, most traditional old customs have been forgotten. In this vein, eating with family members is no exception. While some people hold the view that people need to have regularly family meals together, I strongly believe it is arduous in a novel society. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
First of all, today, the majority of family members have to work for better lives, and so they do not have time to eat with family members. On other words, they have a different schedule, and they cannot eat together, and otherwise, they are at risk of losing their jobs. My family experience is a good example for this, I remember, when I was high school student, at that time, my parents worked, my mother worked in the hospital, and my father was a pilot. At that time, I always ate alone because my parents were at work. On the other hand, despite all these hardships, it can be said that my family has sacrificed to make life better. Thus, the need to work for a better life has led to a decrease in eat with family members together.
Second, nowadays, there are diverse diets for various people, including patients, athletes, and vegetarian, that this situation does not allow eat with family members together. On the other hand, they cannot cook food for everyone with a separate diet because it is hard. My experience is a good example for this, I am a vegan bodybuilder, and my diet is different schedule because I eat six meals a day and this is more difficult in the race conditions so I cannot be following family meal schedules. If I eat according to my diet and family schedule, I cannot progress in my sport. Hence, it can be said that today's family members have different dietary styles that cannot eat meals together.
In conclusion, while there are arguments to be made for both sides of the issue, it is clear that modern social situation not allow other to have regularly family meals together because most of all people have to work for progress life, and because there are different dietary styles that lead to that they cannot eat meals together
- do you agree or disagree with this statement:Nowadays act of having meals together with family members is not important anymore. 61
- Some people believe that parents should pay their children a small amount of money to do jobs around the home (such as washing the dishes or taking out the garbage), while other people believe that parents should not pay their children to do these tasks. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement While parents have the responsibility to educate young people about healthy eating habits schools should also be responsible for this 88
- If your teacher says something incorrect in a class what will you do 1 Interrupt your teacher right away 2 keep silent 3 correct your teacher after class 42
- TPO 41 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...in my sport. Hence, it can be said that todays family members have different dietary s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, so, thus, while, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71352785146 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51351978976 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453580901857 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.544579472 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0625 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5625 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235263501772 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985326339697 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764322277679 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169015128876 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336212631534 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.