Any evolutionary success comes, essentially, from effective adaptation. In the business world, this pattern is seen when analyzing how influential companies keep their reputation, value, and presence in the market. In this context, business students must, in my perspective, understand and master the use of technology -- rather than psychology -- in order to be successful. Learning about the digital universe helps aspiring professionals to build a solid network and to improve their products.
First, technology opens up a vast range of opportunities for a company's reachability. What this means is they can both provide efficient customer support and spread their network range. This happens because nowadays there is a sharp increase in web-surfing and digital research among customers. For instance, a business that provides a website with online shopping would be more likely to attract new customers than one whose team only owns a physical store. At the same time, the company would increase their audience, they could also assist a buyer more rapidly and conveniently. If they didn't offer the website, a customer would have to go to the physical store to solve their problem.
Second, mastering the digital space allows active product development because of customer reviews. These inputs let workers grasp more information about arising societal trends. Take my experience for example. My mom owns a restaurant and on her website page, there were several people demanding vegan options. This helped her adapt to their necessities and successfully create vegan versions of some of the most popular dishes. Simply put, the reviews helped my mom be in charge of the necessary updates that met her clients' expectations.
While psychology helps business students be conscious of their audience's behavior, technology offers a brand new medium for network expansion and important tools for product development. Thus, these are the reasons why I prefer the latter's innovation over the former's academicism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to aspire' or 'aspire'.
Suggestion: to aspire; aspire
...arning about the digital universe helps aspiring professionals to build a solid network ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e company would increase their audience, they could also assist a buyer more rapi...
^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... more rapidly and conveniently. If they didnt offer the website, a customer would hav...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'formers'' or 'former's'?
Suggestion: formers'; former's
... prefer the latters innovation over the formers academicism.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50967741935 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87044954752 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648387096774 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3037961796 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8888888889 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175305885322 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463114240647 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581839056526 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107651217971 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490845937057 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.