do you agree or disagree?in order to celebrate major events, it is better to organize a big party with lots of people than to have a small party where only close friends and relative are invited.

Essay topics:

do you agree or disagree?in order to celebrate major events, it is better to organize a big party with lots of people than to have a small party where only close friends and relative are invited.

The question is whether in order to celebrate major events, it is better to organize a big party with lots of people than to have a small party where only close friends and relative are invited or not. Everyone can maintain a specific direction toward this issue with regard to his private view; inasmuch I try to considerate to cons and pros everything, therefore in my perspective a small party can be more worthwhile. My arguments are listed below which will strengthen my point of view:

To begin with, it is axiomatic that nobody likes to spend a lot of money just for one night. Needless to say that a big ceremony will cause you to waste your budget and also it can take much energy for cleaning, cooking, purchasing and list goes on. There are a huge mass of economics troubles in every house; hence taking place a big party can be illogical. Such a modern world requires being selfish. There are extreme things which can be done by us with this money, for instance registering in a equipped gym, buying the newest smartphone, traveling and saving money for rainy day and so on. It is a bit of ridiculous to pay money for a transient joyful.

The second reason why I refute this idea lies in the fact of humanistic and spiritual aspects. Major events and the parties of related with them are belonging to all people with any social status. A glimpse to statistical graphs will be shown that a lot poor people and children are living in the cities. Instead of spending money for repetitive ceremonies with usual rhythms and meeting the same people every year, we will be able to give a hand to homeless people.

I am willing to empower my reasons by following the discussion. There is a different issue here. In big celebrations, since you will meet a lot of people, it is plausible to you overwhelm. On the one hand you are inclined to speak with people; on the other hand you will not have enough time to spend with all of them. In my country, respecting to guests is an undeniable fact; consequently gathering numerous friends and relatives can be tedious and it is not worth.

By taking all above mentioned arguments, this conclusion could be drawn that having a small party will provide a lot of benefits as saving money for indispensable things, sharing delight with poor cortex, spending time with people who have a common soul with you.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-11 amirbahman 72 view
2016-12-10 peerless alex 89 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 498, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...this money, for instance registering in a equipped gym, buying the newest smartph...
^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[4]
Message: The verb belong is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'belong'
Suggestion: belong
...ts and the parties of related with them are belonging to all people with any social status. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ts and the parties of related with them are belonging to all people with any social status. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, to begin with, with regard to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61428571429 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55769702251 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554761904762 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5532741254 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31991074263 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995143981638 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161899738018 0.0737576698707 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192112795764 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113192977097 0.0645574589148 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 420 350
No. of Characters: 1890 1500
No. of Different Words: 228 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.527 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.5 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.486 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.541 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.288 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.288 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.125 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5