Do you agree or disagree?
it is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor.
The question is whether ingenious people are more valuable as friend or a person who can create a great sense of humor. Everyone in consideration to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however, I am inclined to choose a friend with pleasure soul. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore them in following essay to empower my vantage point:
To begin with, no one could deny the friends’ role in life. In such a hectic society and among the chasings for arriving to the goals, people look for a man who is able to complete their personality. Making new friends creates an opportunity for experiencing of exciting things, soaring, traveling and list goes on. One should not forget that having an appropriate friend can lead us to prosperity routs; therefore it is vital to know the exact meaning of success. In first glance, you may conceive that success is just associate to breakthrough in science, sport, and music fields. Yet at least in my view, if you have a happy soul, you are capable to do everything. Needless to say that a tranquil personality with a mind lack of anxiety and stress can pass from any obstacle; hence, it can be said that a friend who has a joyful spirit can overshadow(?) our life.
Second reason for this argument lies the fact that every man has particular and unique experiences and there is no any law that clever people can guide us to peak of success. Sometimes you can gain new information even from a little kid; consequently, one should try to discover all aspects of his friends. To elucidate, take my own experience. I remember when I started the university; I had to do a research paper with a group. I tried to be in a group that all members of it were intelligent but for some reasons it was not possible. Nevertheless, I participated in a group with ordinary people. In first step I was disappointed; however, I decided to view other perspectives of my group. Not only they were humor and provided a perfect atmosphere in group, but also they could add a great number of new and diverse experiences to me. After doing project, I heard some complications in other intelligent group and also some of its members were frustrated due to the serious and boring circumstance because they had just worked and worked without any telling joke or other points; even more being egotistical did not allow them to share their opinion with each other.
As I have illustrated, advantages of having a humor and delightful friend outweighs to its disadvantages. Communicating with a friend who can make you smile is more honorable than a clever friend with sever behavior.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 861, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Our
...who has a joyful spirit can overshadow? our life. Second reason for this argumen...
^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...lar and unique experiences and there is no any law that clever people can guide us...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, at least, i feel, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2209.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75053763441 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83806118367 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561290322581 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6840984791 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.45 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295488620283 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796652777665 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745417926874 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205769010405 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881603411821 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.