With the advance of modern technology, cooking become easier for people in recent years. The issue regarding whether the easiness of cooking improved our lives has never failed to arouse public concerns at the same time provoke a heated debate among individuals. Some people are inclined to be strong believers in the claim that this easiness is deleterious to our living condition. Perhaps sound and attractive as their argument seems, it can hardly bear closer analysis. In my opinion, I advocate that the easier cooking make our lives better than before. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will elaborate on in the following passage.
On the one hand, easiness of cooking help people to save a lot of time. To be more specific, in this fast-paced world, people in working place have tremendous pressure and relative short time for cooking. The easier for cooking, the more time can be saved to do things that really important. Take my sister for example, she has a busy job which has intensive workload. In the past, she has to spend a lot of time to prepare meals, leaving her no time for relaxation. But nowadays, she can easily go to restaurant to eat a nice meal or buy fast-food whenever she wants. Obviously, this example may inform us that the beneficial of easier cooking should be appreciated.
On the other hand, it's convenient for people who have little cooking skills. Apparently, in the past, if someone want to eat some specific meals, she will have to learn it by herself, which require a large amount of time and numerous effort. Now due to the convenience of restaurant and food technology, by eating outside or buying pre-made food, we can have the same experience as someone who equipped with advanced cooking skill. For people who know little about cooking, they will not have to worry all day long about what they are going to prepare for their supper.
Considering all the reasons and examples discussed above, we can safely come to the conclusion that the easiness of cooking improved our lives，which should be definitely attributed to the two main points, convenient and time-saving.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fic, in this fast-paced world, people in working place have tremendous pressure a...
^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rking place have tremendous pressure and relative short time for cooking. The eas...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...ls. Apparently, in the past, if someone want to eat some specific meals, she will ha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e can safely come to the conclusion that the easiness of cooking improved our liv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, may, really, regarding, so, as to, for example, i feel, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87845303867 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60436152268 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555248618785 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9713557668 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1111111111 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120301362983 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041463018101 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403739945076 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086052008762 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431397475219 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.