Science always plays a pivotal role in our society. It provides us with cutting-edge technology and better medical treatment. Thus, the issue regarding scientific discoveries has never failed to arouse concerns among individuals and at the same time provoke a hot debate about whether it should be shared globally. Some are inclined to be strong believers to the claim that government should hold them secretly. Attractive and sound at the first sight, this argument can not bear further analysis. Accordingly, I, without hesitation, contend that scientific discoveries should be shared to all human beings. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will elaborate on in the following essay.
First of all, no one can deny that sharing the discoveries is beneficial for world's development. By sharing, every country can benefit from modern technology or newest medical treatment. There is nothing but the example of vaccine can illustrate this point more clearly. The spread of coronavirus costs more than one million people's lives among the world. United States and other developed countries invented the vaccines, and then decided to share it around the world. Imagine if these countries decide to hold it to themselves, other developing countries or the entire world will be harmed by this behavior. Obviously, sharing is helpful to promote the overall warfare of the world.
Second, scientist will benefit from sharing too. If government agree to share their knowledge with the world, other countries' scientist can have a better grasp of the modern science. To be clear, if these information can pass to each other without the boundaries of countries, scientists can work together, and some unsolved phenomena may have a proper explanation. Global scientists now have the opportunities to speed their paces due to this openness and team-work. As a result, in a foreseeable future, our technology skills will be greatly improved.
Considering all the arguments and examples given above, we can safely say that government should share the knowledge of science rather than hide it due to its beneficial effect and the chance to make major progress in the future.
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 70
- do you agree or disagrees with the following statement Has the easiness of cooking improved life Give examples and reasons to support your opinion 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Good teachers are more important to a child s development than good parents Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students should be encouraged to take courses like science technology engineering and math that are likely to lead to job opportunities rather than subjects they might be interested in 85
- It is more beneficial for people to stop reading or listening to the news for a few days because there are too many news stories around the world 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omote the overall warfare of the world. Second, scientist will benefit from shar...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...e their knowledge with the world, other countries scientist can have a better grasp of th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
... of the modern science. To be clear, if these information can pass to each other without the boun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, thus, i feel, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25936599424 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78244126985 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590778097983 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2614626366 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.25 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.35 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187903351503 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054886321198 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058004728874 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115793590437 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638084834526 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.