In this day and age, education and learning has been playing an inevitable role in individuals' lives since the advent of technology because in this contemporary society they are indispensable for people to be prosperous in their lives. There is dissimilar opinions about educational systems. A crucial question which has always been the topic of contention and brought about heated debates is whether it is better to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes with them or taking courses with professors whose classes you never taken before. A plethora of people prefer to be taught by different professors who they had not classes with them before, which I entirely concur with. In the following, I will explicitly elucidate my rationale by advancing two reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that spending time with various professors gives one an opportunity to expose herself or himself to different knowledge and information. Apparently, professors each have different skills and special field of education. Therefore, it would be constructive (splendid) to participate in many professors' classes. The more one get involved in different classes, the more he will attain different knowledge and understanding. My own experience is a compelling evidence of this reality. When I graduated, I noticed one mesmerizing fact about my friends. Interestingly, my friends who had preferred to study with same professors in different courses had much less skills and experience than others who were taught with various educators during their studies. Had they not had classes with different professors, they would not have had opportunity to expand their knowledge.
Moreover, by taking courses with different professors, one can get acquaintance with many people. In this highly dynamic world, it is essential to build bridges and have as many as friends it is possible to have because it is vital to have different connections to settle a flourishing career for your future life. As proof to these points, a cutting-edge and comprehensible study undertaken by a number of eminent researchers in the University of London's center for psychology demonstrated that people who are sociable and have more connections are fifty percent more probable to find lucrative jobs in future. Thus, scientifically, this evidence indicates that in order to have more connections it is thoughtful to study with different professors.
In brief, all aforementioned reason and examples lead us to the conclusion that taking courses with professors whom you have not already had other classes with them would be much thoughtful than having courses with same professors. This is because by one can broaden her or his knowledge, and because he or she can strike many friendships and have more connections.
- A company wants to use money to help employees work better One way is to improve the technology equipment computer printer used by employees and improve efficiency Another way is to redesign the space to make the working environment more comfortable 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- When you give money to charitable organizations do you prefer to choose how the donation will be used for example donate money on food or service or advertisement for organizations or leave the decision to the organizations 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 65
- People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment Which one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community Explain why 1 Plant trees a 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this day and age, education and learn...
^^^
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are dissimilar opinions'?
Suggestion: There are dissimilar opinions
...people to be prosperous in their lives. There is dissimilar opinions about educational systems. A crucial qu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rationale by advancing two reasons. The first exquisite point to be mentione...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun skills is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rofessors in different courses had much less skills and experience than others who w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortunity to expand their knowledge. Moreover, by taking courses with differe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nt more probable to find lucrative jobs in future. Thus, scientifically, this evidence in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to study with different professors. In brief, all aforementioned reason and ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2392.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33928571429 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03458159015 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491071428571 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 748.8 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.3872103504 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.894736842 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5789473684 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343761240548 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100582339358 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125269634753 0.0737576698707 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232005719787 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865149519083 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.