Among educational systems teaching and learning process could be done in different manners. Some believe that when students study and do assignments in groups, they grab subjects in an efficient manner, which I concur with. I believe that in this way students will learn from each other, and also there will be a competition within a group, which will encourage students to study harder. In the following I will elucidate my rationale by advancing these two reasons.
First, it is an intrinsic characteristic of humans to learn from each other. During history, it was proved that people have a tendency to imitate others because they will not need much energy to experience new concepts. It is true for students who are working as a group. In a group, different members have different skills; therefore, interacting together gives students an opportunity to attain knowledge form each other. For instance, a recent study undertaken by the University of Tehran demonstrated that humans learn 10 percent more when they work and study within a group rather than when they try alone.
Second, working in a group induce people to work harder. Always, there is a competition in a group that members want to prove themselves, therefore as a group everyone will do his or her best. However, when doing some assignments alone, one can become so overwhelmed and frustrated. For example, when I was in high school, my chemistry teacher gave us an assignment that was so hard and confusing. As a result, nobody among my classmates were able to do it. Therefore, after a week when we were supposed to give the assignment, our teacher got surprised because all of the students did not do that. Then, our teacher divided us to groups in order to do the assignment. The results was perfect because as groups we tried our best and everyone got involved in the assignment because each of us wanted to prove ourselves to our teacher. This example shows how working in a group can encourage students to do their best.
In brief, all aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that working together is so effective than doing some assignments alone. This is because in a group people will learn from each other, and also as individuals they will do their best in order to prove themselves.
- People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment Which one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community Explain why 1 Plant trees a 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 65
- Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before Give specific examples and details to support your answer 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For any business to be successful it must spend a lot of money on advertising 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Among educational systems teaching and l...
^^
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...ucational systems teaching and learning process could be done in different manners. Som...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient manner" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...signments in groups, they grab subjects in an efficient manner, which I concur with. I believe that in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ale by advancing these two reasons. First, it is an intrinsic characteristic...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...ents an opportunity to attain knowledge form each other. For instance, a recent stud...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...up rather than when they try alone. Second, working in a group induce people...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...n a group induce people to work harder. Always, there is a competition in a group that...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ment, our teacher got surprised because all of the students did not do that. Then, our tea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 689, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
...order to do the assignment. The results was perfect because as groups we tried our ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncourage students to do their best. In brief, all aforementioned reasons lea...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in brief, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89175257732 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74609259694 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487113402062 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0729335088 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282486986475 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926633997862 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624793105498 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181955846954 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159130506707 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.