Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before?
During the registration for new semester, students may have two options to enroll a class, which are taking a class with either a familiar professor or an unfamiliar one. In this regard, many incline to participate in a class taught by a new professor since they believe that, it makes them familiar with a new world of meaning and new method of teaching, broadening their horizons. I personally subscribe to the view that it is more beneficial for students to participate in classes that they have experienced in previous studies. I cling to this standpoint for two main reasons, which I will elucidate in the ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, participating in classes that students have the experience working with the professor makes them more prolific since they do not require spending time to fit the new teaching method and some disciplines that every instructor specifies. In fact, students can easily concentrate on the concepts and material taught in the class. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Long time ago, during the university years, I decided to try a new instructor for mechanical science courses in my major, taught by only two professors at that time. The result was awful insomuch as through the course, the more I try, the less I got my desire outcomes because not only the professor did not give us the surprising quizzes, but also he just read theoretical concepts on the book instead of explaining and elucidating them. Thus as we see, had I taken the course with the previous professor, I would definitely have been more successful in the course.
Second, sometimes after some courses one takes with the same instructor, they kind of build a deep relationship, which will benefit greatly both of them. For instance, during the university years, I tried my best to participate in a class taught by one of the university professors, Dr. Kaveh. After two years, he suggested me to make contributions to his new book publication since I had attended most of his classes, and I was quite familiar with his procedures and the chief concepts in his field of teaching. Therefore, nevertheless no longer am I a university student, we still work together. Whenever each of us come up with new ideas, we share them with each other insomuch as up to this time we have published three books and nearly 15 articles in civil engineering field. Thus, as we see, if I had wanted to try new professors within each course, I would never have been honored working with professor Kaveh.
To put all these into a nutshell, considering all the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that it is far better to participate in classes one has the experience working with the professor. I hold this opinion because not only does it help the students to be more prolific, concentrating on the materials, but it might lead to having a great partnership with the professor in sciences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun incline seems to be countable; consider using: 'many inclines'.
Suggestion: many inclines
...r or an unfamiliar one. In this regard, many incline to participate in a class taught by a n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 833, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ead of explaining and elucidating them. Thus as we see, had I taken the course with ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 864, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have never been
... professors within each course, I would never have been honored working with professor Kaveh. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in fact, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2410.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85887096774 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87288978341 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502016129032 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9531971593 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.888888889 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254265704854 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887593134176 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625069937296 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171796754977 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365935227852 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.