When people try to cheer up someone, we can often hear “Never, never give up.” I disagree with the statement that the question suggested. These are the following reasons: this kind of sentence is just showing speaker’s absence of responsibility, it delays the timing to stop or to adjust for correcting again.
First, the reason why they say like the question above is that they are not in my situation. Others can say “never give up” but they do have anything to do with me.. My work is not their business and they do not have responsibility to take care of me. I had someone who says “sleep first and do work later, I do not recommend to be tired yourself” a lot. Finally, she did not wake me up since it was just my fault that I followed her.
Secondly, if we believe everything that others say, we may lose our own way. We sometimes need to decide to leave; it could be advantage if we choose as faster as possible. If we follow others’ opinion such as “never give up”, although we need to change where to focus, we can mess up by missing the timing. I regret that I did not make the decision to go to college in U.S early by listening that the teacher uttered which is “do not give up, just keep going.” If I changed the school early, I may have more time to spare or to study SAT.
Finally, I understand they never remark that with bad purpose. However, if I am, I would better to cheer up others in different ways.
- A friend is trying to reduce living expenses This person is trying to decide among the following three ways to do this Find a roommate housemate who can share living expenses Buy new technology products such as the latest mobile cell phone Buy less expens 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 80
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other hand conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible First atmospheric 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... but they do have anything to do with me.. My work is not their business and they ...
^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend being'.
Suggestion: recommend being
...sleep first and do work later, I do not recommend to be tired yourself' a lot. Finally, sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...uld be advantage if we choose as faster as possible. If we follow others' opi...
^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...make the decision to go to college in U.S early by listening that the teacher utt...
^
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I understand they never remark that with bad purpose. However, if I am, I would b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 270.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53703703704 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75235028635 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7607292703 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2307692308 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329012750191 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110548365983 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107361011875 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197122287274 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952920990721 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.