Nowadays, environment destruction as well as pollution is one of the severest problem globally. With better awareness of protecting local environment, citizens come up with several approaches, such as planting trees and creating gardens, banning plastic bags in local shops, and encouraging public transportation. From my perspective, the first choice is the best due to following reasons.
First and foremost, stricter policy on private car would inevitably lower the traffic efficiency. Take my father as an example, driving to his company only takes twenty minute while taking public transportation usually consumes an hour. For a person who is an extremely busy man and thus would not like to waste even a minute on commuting, it is mentally unacceptable to sacrifice his time, which could be employed to deal with more creative and innovative issues, in order to realize low carbon emission. If everyone is urged to take subways or buses, the entire city may suffer larger losses due to inefficiency.
Furthermore, compared to the third option, banning plastic bags seems more reasonable but still has some problems. In the places where this policy has already been carried out, local shops usually utilize paper bags to replace the plastic one, while the former one is not durable and cannot bear heavy burden, leading to an increasing number of compliments. Gradually, citizens probably turn to shops in the rural area or other neighboring city, which still serve free plastic bags, which is more likely to exert negative effects. Therefore, this way does not provide as much inconvenience as limiting private vehicles, but sometimes lead to opposite consequences.
Last but not least, creating more plant cover is a more radical method. Compared to the other two approaches, this policy does not lead to any inconvenience to our daily life. Besides, modern citizens are usually bombarded with tons of assignments, presentations, projects and examinations, which would inevitably lead to overpressure and tension. By contrast, planting trees and creating gardens offer those hectic people an opportunity to unwind them and turn their brain off, which consequently assists them to return to work with a light heart.
To sum up, the increasing awareness of protecting environment is definitely a good thing. Among the three listed options, I personally prefer the first one most. Encouraging public transportation and forbidding plastic bags both have negative effect in other aspects. However, by vegetating local area, we could benefit our surroundings without any personal scarification.
- Following are three choices to protect the local environment. Which one do you think isthe best and explain why.1. Plant trees and create gardens2. Local shops do not provide consumers with plastic bags3. Take public transportation and reduce the use of p 90
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. Agree or disagree? 90
- Following are three choices to protect the local environment. Which one do you think isthe best and explain why.1. Plant trees and create gardens2. Local shops do not provide consumers with plastic bags3. Take public transportation and reduce the use of p 90
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. Agree or disagree? 83
- Following are three choices to protect the local environment. Which one do you think isthe best and explain why.1. Plant trees and create gardens2. Local shops do not provide consumers with plastic bags3. Take public transportation and reduce the use of p 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fer larger losses due to inefficiency. Furthermore, compared to the third optio...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, third, thus, well, while, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95363346021 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614814814815 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9330973392 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.052631579 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24870851283 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615760609449 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563478822765 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133621609274 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665953543493 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.