friendship
Without a shadow of doubt, competition is of great significance in the development of our friendship. It can not be denied that conflicts aroused by competing with others sometimes hurt the relationship between friends, and such a fact might mislead impressionable people to generate the opinion that competing is harmful for the maintaining of friendship. When it comes to my perspective, as far as the memorable moments created by competition, the improvement made by both sides and the reflect on themselves are concerned, I strongly hold the opinion that competition exerts a positive influence on friendship instead of affecting it negatively.
First of all, memorable moments, which is created by competing, is cherished by both sides and thus the friendship is strengthened. Take my brother and I, who are forced to regard each other as rival, as an example. Since our childhood, we have always involved in struggling to get higher grades than the other, beating against the other when playing sports, trying to be the precursor in a running race, etc. All these activities involving competition consist of our memories about each other. Whenever we talk about our childhood, these unforgettable moments are surfacing, and the topic on our experiences of competition is endless. Through communicating our competitive childhood, our friendship is enhanced.
Moreover, another prominent reason is that both of sides make improvements by participating in competition. Aiming to beat rivals, before the match, one has to be aware of his rival’s advantages and disadvantages. On the other hand, through numerous games, the characters and superiority of one’s opponent are reflected. Holding the same objective to beat the other side, rivals have a tendency to learn from each other, and even ask their opponents for help. During the process of making progress together and learning from each other, not only do they understand mutually, but also their friendship is enhanced. In this way, virtuous competition is created.
A voice arises that conflicts is unavoidable in competition, which is not conducive to the maintaining of friendship. However, this statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies. Admittedly, conflicts hurt the relationship between friends initially. Nonetheless, after conflicts, both sides are inclined to reflect on themselves whether they have done or spoken really outrage the other. Through the process of introspection, it is more likely for them to reconcile by apologizing. Eventually, they understand that it is not readily to maintain friendship so that they will probably try their best to avoid conflicts the next time. Through combined effort, friendship is hardened.
In conclusion, drawing upon the reasons I have mentioned before, I firmly believe that competition is beneficial for strengthening friendship. While there are one thousand Hamlets in one thousand eyes’, I firmly believe my opponents will yield after being shown to my article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 486, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the improvement made by both sides and the reflect on themselves are concerned, I strongly...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hip instead of affecting it negatively. First of all, memorable moments, which i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, really, so, then, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2541.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46451612903 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13597205516 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541935483871 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9084913602 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251930481672 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857484708659 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107992412964 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155058438932 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716035659139 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 10.002688172 205% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.