Which is the most important thing for a country’s leader to assure the prosperity of the country?
1. Creating more jobs for unemployed workers;
2. Increasing agriculture and lowering the food price;
3. Increasing access to affordable housing;
The prosperity of a country is determined by many factors including the social welfare, the gross GDP, the gross consumption, average wages, etc. Thus, In order to make a country prosperous, its leader has to trigger at least one of these factors. From my perspective, creating more jobs for unemployed workers should be prioritized.
Increasing agriculture and lowering the food price sounds efficient but it does not increase the country’s prosperity fundamentally. After the industrial revolution, an increasingly number of countries have stepped into an era when most of their economy depend on the industry rather on the agriculture. In other words, agriculture only contribute little to a country’s economy, which is a good indication of a country’s prosperity. Thus, investing limited resources on the agriculture won’t trigger a nation’s economy tremendously. Plus, although lowering the food price is beneficial for consumers, it could cause severe problems. Agricultural produces want to sell their products in order to gain profits to make a living. However, with the food price lowering, profits gained from agricultural productivity slump, too. In this case, fewer producers are willingly to work on the lands anymore and then the supply of food would plumet, making the temporary benefit for consumers unsustainable.
Second, making house accessible for people won’t lead to prosperity fundamentally, too. Actually, housing in cities may not be a big problem right now. It is admitted that the price of many houses is too high to be accessible for most of people, but they do not have to buy the house to get a shelter. In other words, citizens could rely on renting apartments or houses for finding shelters. Under this circumstance, even if the price of houses is affordable for citizens, most of them are more likely to still choose to rent house rather than buy it, allocating the rest of their budgets into other aspects of their life. In conclusion, making affordable housing accessible won’t change people’s current life so that the prosperity of a country won’t be changed or triggered.
Compared with the two solutions mentioned below, creating more job opportunities is a effective method. As the Economy suggests, the lower base determines the superstructure, which means that only if people’s economic conditions are changed, the whole country’s prosperity could change. If the leader of a country’s decides to create more job opportunities for unemployed citizens, they could be offered salary that aids them to satisfy basic needs of their life, such as food, transportation and housing so that they could live a secure life. Under this circumstance, they could allocate more money into consumption, leading to more demands of various products, which in turn trigger the production. A optimum cycle is created to increase the GDP of a nation and thus maximize the prosperity.
All in all, creating more jobs opportunities for unemployed workers is the best one among three options to increase the prosperity of a country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('increasingly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('number') instead of another adjective.
...tally. After the industrial revolution, an increasingly number of countries have stepped into an era w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...houses is too high to be accessible for most of people, but they do not have to buy the house ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...low, creating more job opportunities is a effective method. As the Economy sugges...
^
Line 7, column 702, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
..., which in turn trigger the production. A optimum cycle is created to increase th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, second, so, still, then, thus, as to, at least, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2599.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33675564682 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05561810887 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519507186858 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 801.0 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6589966553 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1739130435 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495429267856 0.236089414692 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128466995723 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801320208633 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263568879133 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031468711591 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.